I like the idea, but isn't the initial list primarily a question for the
Secretary.
Is the Secretary ok with 1000 additional ICLAs arriving en masse from an
even larger project?
If so, then I think the solution is much simpler; *Let the podling decide*
if it is only Mentors, every user who has sho
In all honesty: What would I as a mentor do, to get the project
rolling? Obvious: Ask the mailing list for an "Initial committer
list". So, what's the point?
Jochen
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> The NetBeans proposal (among many others in the past) has demonstrated a
> si
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> >... Greg's proposal, as far as I can see, is predicated on mentors being
> fully
> > aware of an increased load...
>
> And as such might be an interesting filter to make s
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>... Greg's proposal, as far as I can see, is predicated on mentors being fully
> aware of an increased load...
And as such might be an interesting filter to make sure mentors are
actually going to engage.
-Bertrand
-
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>
>> For example, I'm really curious whether the current cast of NetBeans
>> mentors are really aware of the IP review workload that is going to hit
>> them
>> once NetBeans trie
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> For example, I'm really curious whether the current cast of NetBeans
> mentors are really aware of the IP review workload that is going to hit
> them
> once NetBeans tries to produce its first official Apache Release.
In that regard, I'
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> The NetBeans proposal (among many others in the past) has demonstrated a
> significant "problem" with trying to establish an appropriate list of
> initial committers. There are many people that want to be on, for various
> reasons. Because they
On 9/27/16, 8:38 AM, "gch...@gmail.com on behalf of Greg Chase"
wrote:
>In Apache Geode, we are trying to be liberal about bringing in new
>committers. Anyone who shows an interest, and a series of well formatted
>pull requests that follow are code guidelines are pretty quickly nominated
>to be
On Sep 27, 2016 10:44 AM, "Gregory Chase" wrote:
>
> Having been through this with Apache Geode, I like the idea of paying
> homage to emeritus committers in the proposal and history of the
> technology. If you start with a rule of providing committer privileges to
> those who have directly commi
It's a radical proposal - but I think it would only work well where
the champion/mentors are also from same community - e.g. the kind of
"Already lots of Apache folks" projects that we previously suggested
for the straight-to-PLP mode. There's also the danger of the project
to seem hostile to non-A
+0.5 I like this idea a lot (but there are governance problems to be solved).
I have long been frustrated at folks who jump on the bandwagon and become
initial committers then play no further part in the project.
Do inactive committers harm the project? No, of course they don’t. But it isn’t
f
In Apache Geode, we are trying to be liberal about bringing in new
committers. Anyone who shows an interest, and a series of well formatted
pull requests that follow are code guidelines are pretty quickly nominated
to become committers.
This would make it very easy for emeritus contributors to bec
It is an interesting idea. I thought that the initial committers list
provided the set of people who could define the merit to approve other new
committers. The mentors may not be familiar enough with the technology
and people to make the decision with the "Flavor" the community wants.
The only
Having been through this with Apache Geode, I like the idea of paying
homage to emeritus committers in the proposal and history of the
technology. If you start with a rule of providing committer privileges to
those who have directly committed to the project in the last two or three
years, and a li
Le 27/09/16 à 13:25, Greg Stein a écrit :
> The NetBeans proposal (among many others in the past) has demonstrated a
> significant "problem" with trying to establish an appropriate list of
> initial committers. There are many people that want to be on, for various
> reasons. Because they are commit
Its not a bad idea at all, except you're now relying on already stretched
too thin mentors to help bootstrap the podling.
And since we've agreed that champion can roll off once the podling has been
accepted (since they don't have to be a mentor) you're limiting that a bit
further.
John
On Tue, S
Considering the effort that went into this and the fact that we had just
reached a point where we could move on past this list, I hope you start
using this new rule for the next project submitted.
Pe marți, 27 septembrie 2016, Greg Stein a scris:
> The NetBeans proposal (among many others in the
17 matches
Mail list logo
