On 6/13/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/13/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:02:42PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > >> > On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > >I will try to
On 6/13/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:02:42PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> >> > On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for
ApacheCon
> >> >
> >> > It
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:02:42PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> >> > On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon
> >> >
> >> > It probably makes far more sense to make that Maven 2.x
robert burrell donkin wrote:
>> > On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon
>> >
>> > It probably makes far more sense to make that Maven 2.x.
>
> both would be best
>
> a lot of projects are still maven 1. what
On 6/9/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:15:25AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon
>
> It probably makes far more sense to make that Mave
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:15:25AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon
>
> It probably makes far more sense to make that Maven 2.x. -- justin
*cheer*! Go, Paul, go!
:-)
LSD
On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon
It probably makes far more sense to make that Maven 2.x. -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon
based on what we've put together for Synapse. If I can persuade the
Synapse team to help me it might happen.
even if it's not complete, a starting point would be useful
I
I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon
based on what we've put together for Synapse. If I can persuade the
Synapse team to help me it might happen.
I don't believe that we should view these templates as normative but
rather as a useful aid and also that they should be
On 6/3/06, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
>> I have no argument with someone providing such a template, but I would
>> strongly object to any implication that Maven was mandated. We are not
>> going to endorse Maven as the official build tool for ASF Java
pr
Paul Fremantle wrote:
I have no argument with someone providing such a template, but I would
strongly object to any implication that Maven was mandated. We are not
going to endorse Maven as the official build tool for ASF Java projects.
Sure, and an Ant project shell can do all of that, too
I have no argument with someone providing such a template, but I would
strongly object to any implication that Maven was mandated. We are not
going to endorse Maven as the official build tool for ASF Java projects.
Sure, and an Ant project shell can do all of that, too, probably sharing
most o
12 matches
Mail list logo
