Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
It also seems that Felix has forked Tomcat's servlet code - which is okay:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/felix/trunk/javax.servlet/src/main/java/javax/servlet/GenericServlet.java
However, the copyright years have been altered from the original file
- re
Richard S. Hall wrote:
>
>> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>
>>> It also seems that Felix has forked Tomcat's servlet code - which is
>>> okay:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/felix/trunk/javax.servlet/src/main/java/javax/servlet/GenericServlet.java
>>>
>>>
>>> However, the copyrigh
Based upon the below feedback from Justin, the Felix PPMC have agreed
that there is additional work to be done on Felix before the project is
ready for graduation, including making a release so as to clarify issues
that the release process throws up.
On that basis, I revoke the graduation vote for
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 9/13/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So how does Felix proceed now? Accept that the rules have just changed
>> on it, after spending some months under the view that a release _wasn't_
>> necessary to graduation, and go back and do something it would have do
On 9/15/06, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday September 13 2006 3:22 pm, Leo Simons wrote:
> You know my incubator mantra (well maybe not), "Simpler rules, more
> clarity".
>
> For example, we instate a rule
>
> "Podlings should do a release while in incubation that satisfies
On Wednesday September 13 2006 3:22 pm, Leo Simons wrote:
> You know my incubator mantra (well maybe not), "Simpler rules, more
> clarity".
>
> For example, we instate a rule
>
> "Podlings should do a release while in incubation that satisfies all the
>generic ASF release policy guidelines an
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 9/13/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
personally speaking, i would not support the gradudation any project
that has not demonstrated that they understand the apache releases
policy. doing this is much easier and quicker than creating a proper
relea
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 04:00:37AM +0100, Upayavira wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > On 9/13/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> personally speaking, i would not support the gradudation any project
> >> that has not demonstrated that they understand the apache releases
>
On 9/13/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So how does Felix proceed now? Accept that the rules have just changed
on it, after spending some months under the view that a release _wasn't_
necessary to graduation, and go back and do something it would have done
months ago had it not been told
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 9/13/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> personally speaking, i would not support the gradudation any project
>> that has not demonstrated that they understand the apache releases
>> policy. doing this is much easier and quicker than creating a prop
On 9/13/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
personally speaking, i would not support the gradudation any project
that has not demonstrated that they understand the apache releases
policy. doing this is much easier and quicker than creating a proper
release. just nominate a releas
On 9/13/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 10:24 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> since we started checking releases in detail, it's become clear that
> most projects struggle to create a compliant release at the first
> attempt. nearly every first attempt c
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:05:08PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> So the real question, in my view, is whether or not they demonstrate an
> awareness that there ARE issues, and that they may CHANGE, and are being
> RESPONSIBLE about making sure that what they do is in compliance with ASF
> policy
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> IMO the question is not about performing a release (which is high
> ceremony) but about knowing how to perform a release that complies
> with ASF policy.
And, as I noted in my Felix-specific reply, over the past few years, we have
changed licensing, copyright notic
On Sep 13, 2006, at 10:24 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 9/13/06, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
J Aaron Farr wrote:
> On 9/13/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > As Leo pointed out, 'codebase quality' is
On 9/13/06, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
J Aaron Farr wrote:
> On 9/13/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > As Leo pointed out, 'codebase quality' is not a graduation criteria.
>> And
>> > (hopefully) with Upayv
J Aaron Farr wrote:
On 9/13/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Leo pointed out, 'codebase quality' is not a graduation criteria.
And
> (hopefully) with Upayvira as the initial PMC Chair, I am not worried
that the
> PMC wi
17 matches
Mail list logo
