Hi Alan,
Thanks. I’ll assist when the time comes.
Regards,
Dave
> On Nov 8, 2019, at 2:49 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
> I've reverted the change for now to avoid breaking any builds. Once we've
> either sorted out how to mark these as graduating or Phoenix has finished
> it's work and we have a l
I've reverted the change for now to avoid breaking any builds. Once we've
either sorted out how to mark these as graduating or Phoenix has finished
it's work and we have a link to resolve to, then I'll redo this.
Alan.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:26 PM Alan Gates wrote:
> Sorry, I don't mean I wo
Sorry, I don't mean I won't fix it, I'm just not sure how to fix it at this
point.
Alan.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:21 PM Alan Gates wrote:
> I found the instructions for that here:
> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/transferring.html
> I didn't put in the resolution link yet because there's n
I found the instructions for that here:
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/transferring.html
I didn't put in the resolution link yet because there's no such link yet.
Alan.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:44 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> The podlings.xml change is not really correct. It’s not
Hi Alan,
The podlings.xml change is not really correct. It’s not documented but instead
of you need to have a something like this for each:
https://phoenix.apache.org/omid/“/>
This creates the a link on the table on https://incubator.apache.org/projects
Also, there is no “graduating” status.
I've updated the status of Omid and Tephra to 'graduating' in
podlings.xml. I've also updated the projects/${podling}.xml for each of
them with info on the SGAs (which hadn't been put there) and on their
status as graduating into Phoenix.
I'll let the Phoenix PMC deal with github, JIRA, mailing l
Hi,
> I don't think so. I'll wait the 72 hours for the comment period to end
> (started this morning) and then add a note to the report that Omid and
> Tephra are graduating into Phoenix, unless Justin prefers something else.
That's fine I’ve already note this in the report.
Thanks,
Justin
---
I don't think so. I'll wait the 72 hours for the comment period to end
(started this morning) and then add a note to the report that Omid and
Tephra are graduating into Phoenix, unless Justin prefers something else.
Alan.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 5:14 PM Andreas Neumann wrote:
> Should Tephra st
Should Tephra still file a podling report this month?
-Andreas
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 12:00 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> For the changes to podlings.xml one example of a graduation to a
> subproject is DistributedLog.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Nov 5, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Alan
For the changes to podlings.xml one example of a graduation to a subproject is
DistributedLog.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
> Omid[1] and Tephra[2] have voted to join the Phoenix community as
> sub-projects. Phoenix has voted to accept
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/documents/grants/caskdata-tephra
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 15:16, Alan Gates wrote:
>
> Regarding SGAs, here's the JIRA for Omid:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-2
> According to
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/officers/grants.txt C
Regarding SGAs, here's the JIRA for Omid:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-2
According to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/officers/grants.txt Cask
(original creators of Tephra) submitted a SGA for it and it's one file, but
I don't know where the referenced file is kept.
A
Bertand, thanks for bringing this up. I'll chase those down.
Alan.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:46 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 3:55 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> > ...My current expectation is that we'd just rename the existing Git
> > re
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 3:55 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> ...My current expectation is that we'd just rename the existing Git
> repositories and change the LDAP group which are used to determine write
> access...
>From the Incubator's point of view, I think an additional step is to
confirm and doc
I like the idea of opt-in for committership for the current podling
membership (without any "time to respond" limitation). I don't foresee
any concerns doing that, but will shout if that becomes an issue.
On 10/28/19 3:09 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
According to [4] the first step of gradua
(w/ VP Phoenix hat)
My current expectation is that we'd just rename the existing Git
repositories and change the LDAP group which are used to determine write
access. In other words, your Git repos will exist just as they do now,
but only at different coordinates.
On 10/25/19 12:27 AM, Ohad S
Makes sense. I've replied to the discussion in the Phoenix community so we
know what terms Tephra and Omid are voting on. As soon as I hear from them
I'll start votes in both communities.
Alan.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 3:47 PM Andreas Neumann wrote:
> I agree with Justin, I think we get - at l
I agree with Justin, I think we get - at least in the Tephra community - a
quorum.
-Andreas
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:09 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > According to [4] the first step of graduating into a sub-project of an
> > existing TLP is a vote by the podling. Given that both podling
Hi,
> According to [4] the first step of graduating into a sub-project of an
> existing TLP is a vote by the podling. Given that both podlings have very
> low activity I am not sure we will get the necessary votes to make this
> happen.
I would try and see what happens - the mentors have binding
There appears to be consensus on this thread, as well as in the Phoenix
community[1] that it makes sense for Phoenix to adopt both Omid and
Tephra. My mails to the Tephra and Omid communities[2][3] have gone
unanswered, so I assume silence implies consent.
According to [4] the first step of gradu
+1, Thanks Alan.
Just wanted to verify that adopt means Omid and Tephra will sit in the same
repo as Phoenix but will be able to checkout separately as well. I assume
this is Phoenix folks decision.
I know that in Yahoo Omid is used internally.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:36 AM Gary Helmling wrote:
+1 this seems like the best option.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:29 PM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> +1 this would be a good outcome. Both Tephra and OMID are good
> technologies, with respective pros and cons, and Phoenix can make good use
> of both of them, should they choose to accept ownership of the
+1 this would be a good outcome. Both Tephra and OMID are good
technologies, with respective pros and cons, and Phoenix can make good use
of both of them, should they choose to accept ownership of the code.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:26 AM Alan Gates wrote:
> Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephr
On 2019/10/23 18:16:31, Alan Gates wrote:
> Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,
>
> As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very
> low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be
> candidates for retirement.
>
> The situation here is somew
Hi,
> So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the
> Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with the
> knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from
> current members of those projects going forward. If others are ok wi
+1 It seems to be the best option.
-Andreas
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 6:47 AM Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> 24 Eki 2019 Per, saat 07:11 tarihinde Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> j...@nanthrax.net>
> şunu yazdı:
>
> > +1, good idea.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
Hi,
+1
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
24 Eki 2019 Per, saat 07:11 tarihinde Jean-Baptiste Onofré
şunu yazdı:
> +1, good idea.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 23/10/2019 20:16, Alan Gates wrote:
> > Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,
> >
> > As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month b
+1, good idea.
Regards
JB
On 23/10/2019 20:16, Alan Gates wrote:
Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,
As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very
low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be
candidates for retirement.
The situation here
+1. That seems like the best course of action IMHO.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:54 PM Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> +1
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 23 Oct 2019, at 21:08, Terence Yim wrote:
> >
> > +1 on this
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:36 Dave Fisher wrote:
> >
> >> +1. That’s a good idea.
> >>
> >
+1
-Flavio
> On 23 Oct 2019, at 21:08, Terence Yim wrote:
>
> +1 on this
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:36 Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>> +1. That’s a good idea.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Alan Gates wrote:
>>>
>>> Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,
>>>
+1 on this
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:36 Dave Fisher wrote:
> +1. That’s a good idea.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 23, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Alan Gates wrote:
> >
> > Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,
> >
> > As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very
>
+1. That’s a good idea.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 23, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
> Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,
>
> As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very
> low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be
> candi
32 matches
Mail list logo
