On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:31 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Thanks Ted, Andrew, and sebb,
>
> FOAF files were one of first thing I checked, but I don't have a FOAF file,
> yet I (ptgoetz) am still listed as a member of Storm on p.a.o.
>
> I can confirm that some of the new members have commit right
Thanks Ted, Andrew, and sebb,
FOAF files were one of first thing I checked, but I don't have a FOAF file, yet
I (ptgoetz) am still listed as a member of Storm on p.a.o.
I can confirm that some of the new members have commit rights to our git repo,
but still aren't listed as members on p.a.o.
T
On 12 September 2014 00:12, sebb wrote:
> On 11 September 2014 23:06, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> Last time I had to figure this out, this link was the key:
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess
>>
>
> LDAP is not used for Incubator podling members.
That page is for PMCs, so does not appl
On 11 September 2014 23:06, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Last time I had to figure this out, this link was the key:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess
>
LDAP is not used for Incubator podling members.
Podling groups are defined in the asf-authorization file.
I just checked
http://people.
On 11 September 2014 23:41, Andrew Phillips wrote:
>
>
> From what I recall, the information in people.as..o is generated from FOAF
> files, which are committed to a repo. See [1] for details.
Some of people.a.o is derived from FOAF file.
But the "committers by ..." pages are currently obtained
From what I recall, the information in people.a.o is generated from FOAF files,
which are committed to a repo. See [1] for details.
ap
[1] http://people.apache.org/foaf/index.html
Last time I had to figure this out, this link was the key:
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:23 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> We (Storm) have added a few committers/PPMC members, but they aren’t
> listed under the project on people.apache.org.
>
> Poking t
Hi Benson,
On Sep 1, 2010, at 6:37 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
The site says that only the PMC chair, the ex-PMC chairs, and a
shadowy underground of unnamed other individuals have access to grant
commit karma ... not arbitrary mentors. The site couldn't possibly be
inaccurate, could it?
The
Hi Benson,
On Sep 1, 2010, at 7:38 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Leaving my snarky remark aside, I can now analyze the disconnect in
question. I misinterpreted you as meaning that *any* mentor should be
able to do it, not that projects generally have at least one mentor
who can. In my defense, I
Leaving my snarky remark aside, I can now analyze the disconnect in
question. I misinterpreted you as meaning that *any* mentor should be
able to do it, not that projects generally have at least one mentor
who can. In my defense, I read the tone of that web page as suggesting
that the people with e
On 02/09/2010, at 11:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> The site says that only the PMC chair, the ex-PMC chairs, and a
> shadowy underground of unnamed other individuals have access to grant
> commit karma ... not arbitrary mentors. The site couldn't possibly be
> inaccurate, could it?
It's corre
The site says that only the PMC chair, the ex-PMC chairs, and a
shadowy underground of unnamed other individuals have access to grant
commit karma ... not arbitrary mentors. The site couldn't possibly be
inaccurate, could it?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Generally the men
Generally the mentors will do this for their respective podlings.
On 02/09/2010, at 9:50 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> root notified us of a raft of new committers. Is someone in stock with
> karma to grant karma?
>
> -
> To uns
Thanks, sorry about the out-of-order email responses.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> Done.
>
> Craig
>
> On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> root notified us of a raft of new committers. Is someone in stock with
>> karma to grant karma?
>>
>> ---
Done.
Craig
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
root notified us of a raft of new committers. Is someone in stock with
karma to grant karma?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
F
>> Christian Grobmeier, as you said, was an obvious choice and wanted
>> commit. He already had an account and his iCLA was on file, so I
>> added him to the commit list for log4php.
>
> I also support this decision. Sometimes it is necessary to be flexible
> to get moving again...
Even when the k
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Apr 28, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
>
>> Good to see some new faces, but I'm curious about how it happened. I
>> don't recall any discussion or votes and I didn't request new accounts or
>> make changes to the SVN authorization
On Apr 28, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
Good to see some new faces, but I'm curious about how it happened.
I don't recall any discussion or votes and I didn't request new
accounts or make changes to the SVN authorization file.
Christian Grobmeier, as you said, was an obvious cho
Leo et al.
thanks for you valid input.
The PPMC list has been created. (Before this thread started).
Brett told us that, after I created a jira ticket for that.
Now we use the PPMC for *private* discussions.
Regards,
Matthias
On 6/23/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:55:54PM -0700, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >What do you *want* to do? What makes most sense?
>
> well, MyFaces PMC is faster; but adffaces-ppmc has it's charme too.
> But... after adf is a subproject we'll need to delete this list.
Mike-
On 6/22/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think the future destination of adffaces is so clear that
myfaces-pmc should be making the decisions. My preference is that
adffaces-ppmc be created and those doing the adffaces work be those
making the podling decisions.
I don't think the future destination of adffaces is so clear that
myfaces-pmc should be making the decisions. My preference is that
adffaces-ppmc be created and those doing the adffaces work be those
making the podling decisions. Worse case, it'll be easier to merge
the two if we (myfaces) do
Leo-
> >Or should we create a "adffaces-ppmc" list for the adf faces incubation?
What do you *want* to do? What makes most sense?
well, MyFaces PMC is faster; but adffaces-ppmc has it's charme too.
But... after adf is a subproject we'll need to delete this list.
So, what is easier for you guy
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:04:27PM -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Yah, I guess so. But, then follow the rest of the stuff on the new
> >> > committers page that Jean sent
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >Yah, I guess so. But, then follow the rest of the stuff on the new
> >committers page that Jean sent out.-- justin
>
> thanks justin.
>
>
> After vetting the new candidate, the vote can take place either on the
> PPMC list (with notice posted to the Incubator P
On 6/21/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In previous discussions, the eventual status (subproject/project) of
the podling was not to be considered in decisions until after the
project graduated.It seems like this would continue to be a good
well, the prefered status was/is b
On 6/21/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For Derby we had a PPMC which was useful for personnel discussions. On
graduation responsbility was transferred to the DB PMC.
To me a ppmc for *each* incubator project sounds reasonable.
On Tuscany we don't have a PPMC or other private fo
I think the initial decision was that a PPMC was not necessary as the code was
just going to be imported into the MyFaces project. Therefore, the MyFaces PMC
is responsible for executing the duties that a PPMC would normally do.
Yeah, right the goal was being a MyFaces subproject. Since ADF Fa
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> I think the initial decision was that a PPMC was not necessary as the code was
> just going to be imported into the MyFaces project. Therefore, the MyFaces
> PMC
> is responsible for executing the duties that a PPMC would normally do.
>
> Perhaps we need to clarify
On 6/22/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:04:27PM -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
> We didn't have one for the WebWork incubation, which I think is similar to
> the situation you are in with ADFFaces. We also didn't get clear direction
> on what we were suppo
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:04:27PM -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
> We didn't have one for the WebWork incubation, which I think is similar to
> the situation you are in with ADFFaces. We also didn't get clear direction
> on what we were supposed to do, so we just used the Struts PMC + initial
> commi
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 08:50:30PM -0700, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Yah, I guess so. But, then follow the rest of the stuff on the new
> >> committers page that Jean sent out.-- justin
> >
> >thanks justin.
>
> sorry justin, f
On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yah, I guess so. But, then follow the rest of the stuff on the new
> > committers page that Jean sent out.-- justin
>
> thanks justin.
sorry justin, for bothering you a
On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yah, I guess so. But, then follow the rest of the stuff on the new
> committers page that Jean sent out.-- justin
thanks justin.
sorry justin, for bothering you again...
Or should we create a "adffaces-ppmc" list for the adf fa
Yah, I guess so. But, then follow the rest of the stuff on the new
committers page that Jean sent out.-- justin
thanks justin.
After vetting the new candidate, the vote can take place either on the
PPMC list (with notice posted to the Incubator PMC list) or on the
developer list (with a n
On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because the goal is to have the ADF Faces dontaion (Trinidad) as a
subproject of the MyFaces project. Like the Tobago incubation last
year.
So using the MyFaces PMC list?
Yah, I guess so. But, then follow the rest of the stuff on the
doh. :-) sorry. reading emails too quickly ...
:)
so, what todo? Bringing it up the MyFaces PMC ?
three of the ADF Faces committers are PMC members.
Or should we vote on the dev list? (I don't like this usecase)
-jean
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Jean-
>
> thanks for your email, but the adf faces project has no ppmc, b/c
> we like to be a subproject of our sponsor the myfaces project.
>
> That's why I asked ;)
doh. :-) sorry. reading emails too quickly ...
-jean
> -Matthias
>
> On 6/21/06, Jean T. Anderso
Jean-
thanks for your email, but the adf faces project has no ppmc, b/c
we like to be a subproject of our sponsor the myfaces project.
That's why I asked ;)
-Matthias
On 6/21/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PRO
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> the community around the ADF Faces donation (aka Trinidad) is growing.
>> We like to vote on a new committer. Now here is my question.
>>
>> Where should this happen?
>
> Isn't there a PPMC list for this?
No ppmc list has been created for the adffaces donation
see here the list of our mailing lists:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-16
Because the goal is to have the ADF Faces dontaion (Trinidad) as a
subproject of the MyFaces project. Like the Tobago incubation last
year.
So using
On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the community around the ADF Faces donation (aka Trinidad) is growing.
We like to vote on a new committer. Now here is my question.
Where should this happen?
Isn't there a PPMC list for this? -- justin
---
42 matches
Mail list logo
