Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Perhaps a better solution is an incubator sandbox for code
Or just a directory called "dormant" into which to do an svn move.
+1 - Simple Solution.
+1; create a category on the Incubating projects list called D
On 2/20/09, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>>> Perhaps a better solution is an incubator sandbox for code
>>
>> Or just a directory called "dormant" into which to do an svn move.
>
> +1 - Simple Solution.
The name is not important but the reason
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Perhaps a better solution is an incubator sandbox for code
>
> Or just a directory called "dormant" into which to do an svn move.
+1 - Simple Solution.
--
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At Wed's ASF Board meeting, the board took up the issue of whether
> the attic project's charter is appropriate for incubating code
> The conclusion was no
I could have told you that, too, if anyone had asked.
> Perhaps a better solution is an incubator sandbox for
