On 4/26/06, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Approval didn't happen within a reasonable time frame. I'm assuming lazy
consensus. We're going to continue with the process.
it's lazy concensus: but i don't think that's documented. i'll update the
documentation (unless anyone beats me
Thanks for the feedback, Noel!
On 26.04.2006 13:43:41 Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > please approve the IP clearance paper work for the contribution called
> > "XML Graphics FOP - AFP Renderer" which I've recently committed to the
> > Incubator site.
>
> What you filed seems fine to me. +1
>
>
> please approve the IP clearance paper work for the contribution called
> "XML Graphics FOP - AFP Renderer" which I've recently committed to the
> Incubator site.
What you filed seems fine to me. +1
--- Noel
-
To unsub
Approval didn't happen within a reasonable time frame. I'm assuming lazy
consensus. We're going to continue with the process.
Maybe the requirement to present the IP clearance paper work to the
Incubator PMC for approval should be removed again if it doesn't work. I
think it's good enough if the s
