Hi Aaron!
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 03:02:23PM -0500, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> If you want to involve the community outside the various PMCs, then
Heh. This ain't just open source, its open "just about everything". Of
course I want the wider (developer) community involved...I'd hope
everyone wants tha
On Thursday 16 June 2005 09:43, David Blevins wrote:
> You should ask on the user@geronimo.apache.org list. I would have
> forwarded your message myself, but your confidentiality statement prevents
> me from legally doing so :)
Really? ;o) How about this message ??
Niclas
Confidentiality Statem
Hi Kumar,
You should ask on the user@geronimo.apache.org list. I would have forwarded
your message myself, but your confidentiality statement prevents me from
legally doing so :)
Cheers,
David
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 12:48:48PM +0530, NATARAJAN Sasi Kumar wrote:
> Hai All
>
>
>
>
Bhanu,
The mailing lists can be found in
http://geronimo.apache.org/mail-lists.html
I'll fix the wiki.
Regards,
Alan
> -Original Message-
> From: Bhanu Vasireddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 7:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Geronimo J2EE project
I have read all your mail in detail.
Let me try to address and reply to your points very simply:
1 - Geronimo is not an Apache project, it's still in incubation.
If it proves itself to be unable to work as Apache standards need
it too, it will not become an Apache project. This is exactly
Vic, in response to one of your questions.
Vic Cekvenich wrote:
2. Just so we are using the right dictionary and are on the same page,
lets define a certain word in a hypothetical made up scenario.
Lets say that that a commercially license product was refactored (it
could be any, but lets say J
This is being sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and cc-ed most ( I had to manually
search for e-mails of each, so I gave up after a while) of the officers-
because it discusses policy, and cc-ed the incubator list so there is a
record of it. Before this, I posted a few messages on Jakarta-General,
sam
This is being sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and cc-ed most ( I had to manually
search for e-mails of each, so I gave up after a while) of the officers-
because it discusses policy, and cc-ed the incubator list so there is a
record of it. Before this, I posted a few messages on Jakarta-General,
sam
geronimo now has it's own list. see
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo.html.
- robert
On Thursday, September 25, 2003, at 01:00 AM, Daniel Halem wrote:
Hi,
I'm a senior engineer who's very experienced with Java and J2EE server
implementations. I was the architect behind BroadVision
From: Daniel Halem
> Hi,
>
> I'm a senior engineer who's very experienced with Java and
> J2EE server implementations. I was the architect behind
> BroadVision's Servlet and JSP container. I'd be interested
> in working on Geronimo(part time), if you have stuff for me
> to work on.
Simple
Geronimo has invited contributions from any source, subject to the normal
ASF CLA and approval by existing committers (the normal Apache process).
To be certified it must implement the entire J2EE specification (which
obviously includes JMS) using code that can be released by ASF. If you are
willi
Greg Stein wrote:
Hi all,
Two mailing lists have been set up for Apache Geronimo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- general discussion list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- receives CVS commit emails
These are standard EZMLM mailing lists. You can subscribe to them by sending
email to one/both of the followin
M
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Geronimo
>
>
> Geronimo has invited contributions from any source, subject to the normal
> ASF CLA and approval by existing committers (the normal Apache process).
>
> To be certified it must implement the entire J2EE specification (which
> A J2EE container is a little different from an Avalon container. Avalon
> is a generic service/component framework. The core Geronimo container
> is an optimised J2EE container developed from a great deal of
> experience and use of JBoss, OpenEJB & mx4j. Its particularly geared
> towards EJB
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jason Dillon wrote:
> The EJB container is NOT built in to JBoss... it is a set of services
> which plugin to the core.
Is the EJB server part of the core of Geronimo? If not, will it
be packaged in CVS as completely external to the core and totally
interchangeable wi
Will the module also be available via rsync?
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
Hi all,
Two mailing lists have been set up for Apache Geronimo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- general discussion list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- receives CVS commit emails
These are standard EZMLM mailing li
> They can read the archives via http://incubator.apache.org/mail/general/
> and I think KenCoar has already requested infra team to let it (this
> list) visible via eyebrowse (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/).
How should they know? The announcement said this: "To find out more about
this proj
Thanks!
Greg Stein wrote:
Hmm. I think somebody needs to update an rsync configuration file for that
(which requires root privs, which I don't have). I'll follow up on it,
thanks.
Cheers,
-g
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:51:53PM +0530, Aditya Gore wrote:
Will the module also be available via rsync?
through hundreds of e-mails to find
out what plans/decisions have been decided on.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Geronimo: Sounds like some plans have already been made...
On
Greg,
Paul -- please set your umask [on login] to enable group-write on the files
in /www/incubator.apache.org. It is making it very difficult for others to
update the site :-)
I've 755'd all in my name. I think that is enough..
- Paul
--
http://www.thoughtworks.com -> The art of heavy liftin
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 02:21 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I thought it was a _weakness_ of JBoss
that the EJB container is "built in". Why is Geronimo an extensible
EJB
container, instead of a J2EE server framework that accepts a generic
EJB
container as well as a
Geir,
http://incubator.apache.org/updating_docs.html
Site now updated.
Thx - problem is, I didn't check in the html and pdf - I figured that
you'd use forrest to regen. Can it be done again?
This time genned and updated. Great work.
Sigh, my hastily penned words did not last long!
- Pau
> What I would like to see for a
> future release of
> Geronimo is an E-Mail Message Bean container. That is, a Message
> Bean that can
> process incoming e-mails.
We already have the Mailet API see: http://james.apache.org I'd be more
interested in adapting this, and implementing a mailet conta
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 05:55 pm, Tim Urberg wrote:
A J2EE container is a little different from an Avalon container.
Avalon
is a generic service/component framework. The core Geronimo container
is an optimised J2EE container developed from a great deal of
experience and use of JBoss, Op
Paul,
Check your login scripts. Your umask is 022. It should be 002.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I've added a page documenting this. When the site refreshes, it will
> appear at:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/updating_docs.html
Site now updated.
-ph
Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Y
They can read the archives via http://incubator.apache.org/mail/general/
and I think KenCoar has already requested infra team to let it (this
list) visible via eyebrowse (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/).
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 5 Aug 2003 23:21:24 +0200
(Subject: Re: Geronimo
Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> To be certified Geronimo needs to fully support JMX. So the current
> plan is to follow the Tomcat 5 & JBoss ideas to use MBeans to register
> & wire the services together. Whatever component model or libraries a
> particular service wishes to u
Maybe a quicker answer to this thread is - the core Geronimo container
is an EJB / MDB container which supports pluggable services via JMX.
Thats quite different to the scope of Avalon.
(Can you tell I've given up caffeine recently - my brains still a bit
fuzzy today :)
On Wednesday, August 6
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 09:17 pm, Larry Sanderson wrote:
A couple of questions I have regarding this project are:
1) Will this initially be a fork of JBoss or any other open source
containers?
No
2) Will the project be managed as an integration of many stand-alone
components (Servlet con
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 02:23 am, Tim Anderson wrote:
Will Geronimo integrate existing OS,
or is it intended to have a standalone codebase?
It will be integrating existing OS which is license-compatible with
Apache. So I think anything which has a normal BSD / ASF style licence
should
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:28:44PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> I'd like to update the geronimo pages on the incubator site to provide
> more info. Can someone email me (privately if you wish) and let me
> know how?
I've added a page documenting this. When the site refreshes, it will
app
Obviously we will need a JavaMail implementation. Isn't there one out there
somewhere that is BSD like? What I would like to see for a future release of
Geronimo is an E-Mail Message Bean container. That is, a Message Bean that can
process incoming e-mails. One way to accomplish this is to implem
I just took a quick look at James. Nice job. I think the Mailet API is an
excellent component model and would work well as an MDB. We would need to
write adapters to make the Mailets conformant with EJB 2.1, but I don't
think that will be very difficult. What we will need to do, however, is
wrapper
James/Geir need to create a PROPOSAL.html or some such.
To do this, they need CVS.
To get CVS, they need to get around the -1 on the name from Roy, or just
ignore him.
What are the incubator rules on -1's in this case? Is Roy's -1 binding?
Once the PROPOSAL.html is written, it and STATUS.html sh
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 04:10 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:21 PM
On the project front, am I correct that the goal is to integrate
other projects wherever possible and only build
Oh, yep. you are right.
Maybe, more slight changes (improvements) at the incubator site top
will be needed :)
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 5 Aug 2003 23:50:03 +0200
(Subject: Re: Geronimo)
"Andreas Kuckartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > They can read
ginal Message-
> From: Richard Monson-Haefel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 August 2003 10:16
> To: Danny Angus
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [geronimo] Me, James and javaMail
>
>
> I just took a quick look at James. Nice job. I think the Mailet API is an
>
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 08:51 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
James/Geir need to create a PROPOSAL.html or some such.
To do this, they need CVS.
Post any files you want committed, or patches, and I or someone
with appropriate privs can commit them. Eventually we'll get sick
of committing all yo
On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 12:48 PM, Kevin Tew wrote:
I am interested in helping out in any way possible
I have a lot of java experience and j2ee experience and would love to
get in
and help early.
Watch this space :)
Kevin Tew
--
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 02:06 PM, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 08:51 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
James/Geir need to create a PROPOSAL.html or some such.
To do this, they need CVS.
Post any files you want committed, or patches, and I or someone
with appropriate privs
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:06:05AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 08:51 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> >James/Geir need to create a PROPOSAL.html or some such.
> >To do this, they need CVS.
CVS has already been created. The 'incubator-geronimo' module. See:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 02:06 PM, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> For example, could I veto the name 'XMLBean' by just posting to the
> members list? I don't think so.
I'd like to -1 it. It should be XmlBean *start the usual Sun are useless
fl
Greg,
Paul -- please set your umask [on login] to enable group-write on the files
in /www/incubator.apache.org. It is making it very difficult for others to
update the site :-)
Will do.
-ph
--
http://www.thoughtworks.com -> The art of heavy lifting.
Home for many Agile practicing, Open Source
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 05:18 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote:
Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 04:34 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote:
Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
To be certified Geronimo needs to fully support JMX. So the current
plan is to
On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 05:21 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
I am interested in helping out in any way possible
Watch this space :)
Are you sure that all these people subscribed to this mailing list?!
No, but I'm not going to answer them individually. I'll just post this
from time to time u
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:04:39PM +0100, Paul Hammant wrote:
> > I've added a page documenting this. When the site refreshes, it will
> > appear at:
> >
> > http://incubator.apache.org/updating_docs.html
>
> Site now updated.
Paul -- please set your umask [on login] to enable group-write on th
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 08:43 AM, Gareth Bryan wrote:
For those of us not in the know / new to ASF etc: Could someone from
the
board post a message detailing what plans / discussions have already
been
made?
Fortunately, very few decisions have been made (none that I can think
of)
that
The EJB container is NOT built in to JBoss... it is a set of services
which plugin to the core.
--jason
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 02:21 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I thought it was a _weakness_ of JBoss
that the EJB container is "built in". Why is Geronimo an extens
Hmm. I think somebody needs to update an rsync configuration file for that
(which requires root privs, which I don't have). I'll follow up on it,
thanks.
Cheers,
-g
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:51:53PM +0530, Aditya Gore wrote:
> Will the module also be available via rsync?
>
>
> jean-frederic cl
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 11:04 AM, Paul Hammant wrote:
I've added a page documenting this. When the site refreshes, it will
appear at:
http://incubator.apache.org/updating_docs.html
Site now updated.
Thx - problem is, I didn't check in the html and pdf - I figured that
you'd use forrest
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 03:12:37PM -0700, Jeff Turner wrote:
>...
> > The instructions say that the PDFs will be regenerated, but that is
> > happening on my machine. Is there a missing component? Or a separate
> > command to run? Different config/param somewhere?
>
> It's a bug in CVS Forrest's h
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 02:04:36PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:45:21AM +1000, Jeff Turner wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:28:44PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> > > I'd like to update the geronimo pages on the incubator site to provide
> > > more info. Can some
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 03:02 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 02:06 PM, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 08:51 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
James/Geir need to create a PROPOSAL.html or some such.
To do this, they need CVS.
Post any files yo
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:45:21AM +1000, Jeff Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:28:44PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> > I'd like to update the geronimo pages on the incubator site to provide
> > more info. Can someone email me (privately if you wish) and let me
> > know how?
>
>
> Obviously we will need a JavaMail implementation.
There is Classpathx, under GPL. The James Project has looked into
sponsoring a JavaMail sub-project containing JavaMail.
> What I would like to see for a future release of Geronimo is
> an E-Mail Message Bean container. That is, a Message Bean
> Why is Geronimo an extensible EJB container, instead of a J2EE
> server framework that accepts a generic EJB container as well
> as a generic servlet container, generic mail service, etc?
Hopefully, that is just phrasing.
--- Noel
---
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 12:38 pm, Danny Angus wrote:
Hi,
Probably biting off more than I can chew here, I'm currently as busy
as the
day is long :-(, but I'd be happy to look at implementing javaMail for
Geronimo.
Great stuff Danny. Lets all start chewing soon :)
James
---
http://
Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 04:34 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote:
>
> > Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> To be certified Geronimo needs to fully support JMX. So the current
> >> plan is to follow the Tomcat 5 & JBoss ideas to use
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 04:34 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote:
Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
To be certified Geronimo needs to fully support JMX. So the current
plan is to follow the Tomcat 5 & JBoss ideas to use MBeans to register
& wire the services together. Whatever component mo
Hi Tim
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 03:56 am, Tim Anderson wrote:
I'm willing to help integrate OpenJMS -
I'm not in a position to donate the OpenJMS
codebase, and I'm not particularly interested
in forking it.
Integrating OpenJMS would be a great step forward. AFAIK for
certification we ca
> > I am interested in helping out in any way possible
> Watch this space :)
Are you sure that all these people subscribed to this mailing list?!
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-m
62 matches
Mail list logo
