On 7 November 2011 14:11, Tim Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
...
>> That being said, thank you for improving this template, I've added
>> your enhancements to the original template over at ComDev (along with
>> the modification suggested by Craig).
>
>
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> You use the phrase "committ rights" in this template. They are not
> "rights" they are "privileges". The reason this might be important is
> that very occasionally it is necessary for a PMC to remove these
> privileges, it is one of the few blu
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> You might consider this nit-picking but it might also be important at
> some point in the future.
>
> You use the phrase "committ rights" in this template. They are not
> "rights" they are "privileges". The reason this might be important is
> t
You might consider this nit-picking but it might also be important at
some point in the future.
You use the phrase "committ rights" in this template. They are not
"rights" they are "privileges". The reason this might be important is
that very occasionally it is necessary for a PMC to remove these
Hi Dennis,
I'd update item 3 below
On Nov 3, 2011, at 5:21 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
3. When you transmit the completed iCLA, indicate that you are
to be a committer and PPMC member of the Apache [OOo podling].
This will allow the Secretary to notify the PPMC when your
iCLA has
Here's a modification of the letter that I have been evolving. It has been
used in recent invitations from the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling where no
iCLA is on file.
You are welcome to try this. There are additional places to be customized
for use by a different podling. I have added bracket