On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> YAML is more human editable than JSON. As Sebb points out elsewhere,
> it also supports comments.
Alternative: create DOAP files for podlings. In general, model
podlings like PMCs as much and as soon as possible.
- Sam Ruby
-
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:49 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:44 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> Some of the data that you mentioned doesn't need to be in the status
>> file as it can be generated from other sources. For example:
>> https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/json/podlingn
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...I'm not sure how much others care about clutch
> ...work has started to generate podling reporting
> data out of whimsy using a data feed,
> https://whimsy.apache.org/public/public_podlings.json - take a look at the
> schedule section
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:44 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
> Not sure where to comment, so I'll top post.
>
> Some of the data that you mentioned doesn't need to be in the status
> file as it can be generated from other sources. For example:
> https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/json/podlingnamesearch.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:32 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:22 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > ...Looking at our current tracking file for podlings, I wonder how much
> of the
> > information is useful...
>
> I agree that a good part o
Not sure where to comment, so I'll top post.
Some of the data that you mentioned doesn't need to be in the status
file as it can be generated from other sources. For example:
https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/json/podlingnamesearch. I'll
refactor that code and add that information to the pp
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:22 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...Looking at our current tracking file for podlings, I wonder how much of the
> information is useful...
I agree that a good part of the information found in podling status
pages belongs on their own websites, as soon as those are up.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:40 AM sebb wrote:
> On 6 June 2017 at 04:22, John D. Ament wrote:
> > As a follow up to my prior question, (
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/31119aafbc4260720d222666f3efd01f2fe2975e424039ea539c9cb6@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > ).
> > Looking at our c
On 6 June 2017 at 04:22, John D. Ament wrote:
> As a follow up to my prior question, (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/31119aafbc4260720d222666f3efd01f2fe2975e424039ea539c9cb6@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> ).
> Looking at our current tracking file for podlings, I wonder how much of t
