On 12/15/05, Granqvist, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... I'm going to go
> > ahead and commit the original source (package names, no
> > licence etc) and then immediately reorganize package names
> > and add licensing.
>
> Why not reorg package names before committing it?
I want to commit t
> ... I'm going to go
> ahead and commit the original source (package names, no
> licence etc) and then immediately reorganize package names
> and add licensing.
Why not reorg package names before committing it?
Hans
-
To uns
+1
On 12/13/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've a codebase donated from Netcetera to add to Commons Sandbox as
> the beginnings of a Commons CSV component.
>
> There is obviously the Commons community to work on the component, but
> more specifically there are 3 ASF committers who
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Thinking on this further, I may have poorly described this.
>
> A code donation has been offered to Jakarta (Commons). From what I
> understand, this has to go via the Incubator to ensure it is above
> board etc as it is from a company and not ASF committers, but does it
> a
Thinking on this further, I may have poorly described this.
A code donation has been offered to Jakarta (Commons). From what I
understand, this has to go via the Incubator to ensure it is above
board etc as it is from a company and not ASF committers, but does it
actually have to become an incubat
On 14-07-2005 04:30, "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/11/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 2) How much of the Incubator process would apply to Commons?
All of it.
>> Many of
>> the exit conditions are automatically passed just by being a part of
>> Commons. [http
On 7/11/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) How much of the Incubator process would apply to Commons? Many of
> the exit conditions are automatically passed just by being a part of
> Commons. [http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ExitingIncubator] Please
> don't take this question as an
