On 26.09.2014 20:03, jan i wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
>> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
>> code bases written "before my time"):
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:04 AM,
>I¹m also not sure what history you mean. The only donation that I know of
>that there was no follow through was the Swiz donation.
Also for context: The Swiz folks never submitted the software grant so
technically it hasn't been donated.
-Alex
--
On Sep 28, 2014, at 7:51 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> For some projects automatic committership may work, but given Flex's history
> with donations it's probably not suitable choice of action.
I don’t see what’s different about Flex. The rationale to give them committer
rights is to increase th
For more context, there has been only one prior donation from
non-committers to Flex and that was completed only 26 days ago. All but
one other donation has come from Adobe and are parts of existing Flex
products that Adobe provided before the transition to Apache.
-Alex
On 9/28/14 9:51 AM, "Jus
Hi,
For some context the Flex project has has several donations that have ended up
get little or no involvement from the community or the people who donated them
after donation. For most projects donations (once a project is top level) are
reasonably rare and from what I can see most donations
On 28 September 2014 15:24, sebb wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 19:03, jan i wrote:
> > On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> >
> >> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
> >> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
> >> code bases wr
On 26 September 2014 19:03, jan i wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
>> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
>> code bases written "before my time"):
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1
On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
> code bases written "before my time"):
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
> wrote:
> >
Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
(that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
code bases written "before my time"):
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> OK. I will give you my personal opinion since you are seeking to d
, September 26, 2014 9:42 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Code Donations and Committer Righs
Hi Ross,
Yes, I am asking here because of lack of consensus in the Flex project.
In this particular scenario the Flex TLP has received a donation from
non-committers. I know one of our
Hi Ross,
Yes, I am asking here because of lack of consensus in the Flex project.
In this particular scenario the Flex TLP has received a donation from
non-committers. I know one of our mentors mentioned that he was given
committer rights to different project for bringing in a code base after
that
It really depends on the project. I don't think there are enough cases of code
coming into an existing project via SGA to be able to say "most projects". Fact
is most have never faced this issue. I could give you my personal opinion but
I'm pretty sure someone on this list would have a different
12 matches
Mail list logo
