Re: Citing documentation when critiquing podlings

2013-01-23 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Looking at this: > >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > ...it makes me headache. I made a bit of headway revising releasemanagement.html a few months back, but got stuck eventually. Ideally, that page wo

Re: Citing documentation when critiquing podlings

2013-01-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
You mean http://www.producingoss.com/en/growth.html#using-archives ? (the first paragraphs apply just a well to documentation as to mail archives) Benson Margulies wrote on Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 13:54:07 -0500: > I'd like to float the following idea: > > Any time anyone offers a critique of a podl

Re: Citing documentation when critiquing podlings

2013-01-21 Thread Ross Gardler
+1 to citing documentation as much as possible. It would be great if s wiki page could be maintained keeping such references in one place. Eventually this could be written up on the community.a.o site. On 21 January 2013 18:54, Benson Margulies wrote: > I'd like to float the following idea: > >

Re: Citing documentation when critiquing podlings

2013-01-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Yes, I like this approach and already try to do that. I also would like to suggest that we try to update the docs to be a good reference. Looking at this: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html ...it makes me headache. I found it always very difficult to discuss changes to such