On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 14:56 -0500, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
> Thanks Kevan, do I need to call for that formally myself or does it
> need to come from an Incubator PMC member?
If you have sufficient mentors on your proposal, then anyone can do it.
Just be sure to embed the proposal into the vote
2:53 cc
PM
Subject
Re: Apache Wink Proposal
Please respon
On May 6, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
All,
Given that the discussion has quieted down after an initial flurry,
I was hoping we could move this forward.
If there are no further comments/concerns, could we call for a vote
on whether or not to accept the proposal by Friday
, "Alsaigh
Cohen, Tali"
,
"Shadi, Tomer"
; Alsaigh Cohen, Tali; Shadi, Tomer
Subject: RE: Apache Wink Proposal
Thanks Eli...
We've had some preliminary discussions about the design of each engine, but
I'll be interested to see how similar the approaches are once we're able to get
the code out.
While we wait for feedback
, "Alsaigh
Cohen, Tali"
,
"Shadi, Tomer"
Subject: Re: Apache Wink Proposal
> If you would have asked the CXF community, we would have been happy to tell
> you that the JAX-RS implementation has NO DEPENDENCIES on the JAX-WS
> implementation.There is a CXF "core" with various personalities layered on
> top. JAX
cc
AM
Subject
Re: Apache Wink Proposal
Please respond to
Niclas,
We will try the best to make the community dynamics happen. When we get around to looking at the source, you will see
the existing cxf code packages and classes as-is. So theoretically we will be able to get some value out of it in terms
of contributing back to cxf.
On a related note,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Greg Truty wrote:
> Hello all, I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for
> Apache Wink, stand-alone REST toolkit supporting JAX-RS (JSR 311), a
> client runtime and test cases (as well as other items).
I hear Dan's concerns, but *I* don't think t
On 23/04/2009, at 3:59 AM, Peltz, Christopher wrote:
Greg - one correction - HP did sign an Apache CLA, so it should say
"Yes", next to all HP initial committers.
That's not correct - each still requires an individual CLA if they are
going to participate in the project. I think you are thi
.@ibmus,
tali.alsaigh-co...@hp.com,
tomer.sh...@hp.com
lythe/Raleigh/i...@ibmus, "Baram,
Eliezer" , el...@hp.com, nadav.fisc...@hp.com, "Snitkovsky,
Martin" , tali.alsaigh-co...@hp.com,
tomer.sh...@hp.com, Michael Rheinheimer/Austin/i...@ibmus
Date:
04/22/2009 03:00 PM
Subject:
Re: Apache Wink Proposal
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 a
l: gtr...@us.ibm.com
>> Phone: (ext) (512) 286-8985
>> (Tie) 363-8985
>>
>>
>>
>> From:
>> Daniel Kulp
>> To:
>> general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Greg Truty/Austin/i...@ibmus, Nicholas L Gallardo/Austin/
ruty/Austin/i...@ibmus, Nicholas L Gallardo/Austin/i...@ibmus, Dustin
> Amrhein/Austin/i...@ibmus, Bryant Luk/Austin/i...@ibmus, Jesse A
> Ramos/Austin/i...@ibmus, Christopher J Blythe/Raleigh/i...@ibmus, "Baram,
> Eliezer" , el...@hp.com, nadav.fisc...@hp.com, "Snitkovsky,
&
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
> So, basically, you wanted a JAX-RS implementation. You looked at Apache
> CXF
Just to make matters more muddy .. Axis2 has full REST support and there's
some work that was started to support JAX-RS but never completed (not
exactly major
J Blythe/Raleigh/i...@ibmus, "Baram,
Eliezer" , el...@hp.com, nadav.fisc...@hp.com, "Snitkovsky,
Martin" , tali.alsaigh-co...@hp.com,
tomer.sh...@hp.com, Michael Rheinheimer/Austin/i...@ibmus
Date:
04/22/2009 02:15 PM
Subject:
Re: Apache Wink Proposal
On Wed April 22 2009 1:
Dan,
I do think that "graduating" via a merger with the CXF implementation
and engagements with that community is a good goal to have. I believe
we call that out explicitly since we tell all projects that when the
time is ripe we can figure out where the project is gonna live. So +1
for that optio
Greg - one correction - HP did sign an Apache CLA, so it should say "Yes", next
to all HP initial committers.
From: Greg Truty [gtr...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 11:07 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Nicholas L Gallardo; Dustin Amrhein; Br
On Wed April 22 2009 1:07:39 pm Greg Truty wrote:
> Hello all, I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for
> Apache Wink, stand-alone REST toolkit supporting JAX-RS (JSR 311), a
> client runtime and test cases (as well as other items). The full proposal
> can be found on the wiki at
) 286-8985
(Tie) 363-8985
From:
"Raymond Feng"
To:
Date:
04/22/2009 01:04 PM
Subject:
Re: Apache Wink Proposal
We're adding JAX-RS support in Tuscany to provide the RESTful services in
SCA. The contributed prototype [1] is based on Jersey. Having an Apache
Elman,
Michael" , "Fischer, Nadav" ,
"Snitkovsky, Martin" , "Alsaigh Cohen, Tali"
, "Shadi, Tomer" , Michael
Rheinheimer/Austin/i...@ibmus
Date:
04/22/2009 01:02 PM
Subject:
RE: Apache Wink Proposal
Greg - one correction - HP did sign an Apache CLA, so
We're adding JAX-RS support in Tuscany to provide the RESTful services in
SCA. The contributed prototype [1] is based on Jersey. Having an Apache
licensed JAX-WS implementation would be a good fit for us.
Thanks,
Raymond
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2919
--
23 matches
Mail list logo
