Hi Flavio,
Thanks for checking the page of `apache.org`, you can view the screenshot
directly in [1] attachment or [2]. At present, I can't see the link at
apache.org. Maybe it's the polling display(I am not sure)
Best,
Jincheng
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19576
[2] https://i
Hi Jincheng,
The status page is now live and being populated:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nuttx.html
I'm not sure where the broken link in the main apache.org page is.
-Flavio
> On 16 Dec 2019, at 08:07, jincheng sun wrote:
>
> I found there is a link of NuttX is not work in home pa
Hi,
I've added a question about branding and naming to the proposal document and to
the report template.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 9, 2019, at 7:37 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Perhaps it was unclear but I was thinking of adding that to teh quarterly
> report.
>
>> I would start with:
>>
>> 0. Has the VP, Brand approved the project name? Does the podling understand
>> the nuance
Hi,
Perhaps it was unclear but I was thinking of adding that to teh quarterly
report.
> I would start with:
>
> 0. Has the VP, Brand approved the project name? Does the podling understand
> the nuances
Where you thinking of adding this to the podling proposal right?
Thanks,
Justin
--
Hi Justin,
Thank you for bringing this issue forward!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 9, 2019, at 3:31 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Given a few issues that have come up recently, and it seems to be something
> that some podlings check just before they want to graduate rather than
> ac
I have added you. Happy editing.
On Wed, May 2, 2018, 7:26 AM Josh Fischer wrote:
> I'm sending this to clarify my request. I am sending this to get write
> access to the apache incubator wiki. My username is JoshFischer. Thank
> you for your time.
>
> 2018-05-01 14:37 GMT-05:00 Josh Fischer
I'm sending this to clarify my request. I am sending this to get write
access to the apache incubator wiki. My username is JoshFischer. Thank
you for your time.
2018-05-01 14:37 GMT-05:00 Josh Fischer :
> JoshFischer
>
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Bikas Saha wrote:
Please add account - BikasSaha - to the incubator wiki contributor
group.
Karma granted, happy editing!
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additio
Hi Wang,
The mailing list for MXNet will be created when the project is
accepted as Apache Incubator Podling. It's under discussion.
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Wang Haoran wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm Haoran Wang, one of the member in DMLC. Could you please add this address
Flavio,
It should just be an incubator LDAP change.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm wondering what the right way is to add committers to a podling with a
> git repository. According to this page, we add them to the incubator ldap
> group:
>
> http://
Hey John,
depending on the help you are looking for, I may can give a hand. Let me know
your plan and the things you like to improve.
Cheers
Markus
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:36 PM +0200, "John D. Ament"
mailto:johndam...@apache.org>> wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#wh
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#who-auth-karma
This section seems to only refer to websites, and would only be true for
SVN based websites hosted under incubator. Most websites are either
standalone in SVN or slowly moving to git.
You would need Ted or another VP to add someone to
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
> I would like to add 'KarthikRamasamy' to the incubator wiki contributors
> group
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
This is a mentor task more than a general@incubator task.
Let's redirect the conversation back to dev@ and see if we can wrassle up a
mentor with sufficient free time. (I am a mentor, in fact)
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in a thread with the subject "[VOTE
Thank you!
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur
> wrote:
>
> > I am a committer/PPMC on Apache Sentry( incubating) and would like to
> > submit the board report for June. Can some one please put me in the
> > ContributorsGr
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote:
> I am a committer/PPMC on Apache Sentry( incubating) and would like to
> submit the board report for June. Can some one please put me in the
> ContributorsGroup, so that I can add the Sentry report ?
>
> UserName on incubator wiki: Sravy
Okey dok Nick, we'll keep you on board.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On Sep 27, 2011, at 8:07 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:35:29 -0700
> "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> (changing subject line)
>>
>> Do you want to be added as mentor? We're happy to have you pa
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:35:29 -0700
"Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> (changing subject line)
>
> Do you want to be added as mentor? We're happy to have you participate.
> But, if that wasn't your intention, we can take you off too. Just let us
> know,
> soon preferably :)
Well
Hi Iman,
1. The first thing is to create a ProjectNameProposal on the Incubator
wiki. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
This proposal will introduce the project, the rationale, etc.
2. When your wiki is done, you can send an e-mail to
general@incubator.apache.org with the [PROPOSAL] prefix.
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 August 2011 9:05 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Add committer to asf-authorization-template
>
> On 16 August 2011 12:25, sebb wrote:
> > On 16 August
On 16 August 2011 12:25, sebb wrote:
> On 16 August 2011 04:07, Craig L Russell wrote:
>> Hi Sebb,
>>
>> Please feel free to update the document as you see fit. CTR.
>
> OK, I'll give that a try;
> However not sure I have enough karma (I'll find out).
I've updated the ppmc guide, and the pmc gui
On 16 August 2011 04:07, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> Please feel free to update the document as you see fit. CTR.
OK, I'll give that a try;
However not sure I have enough karma (I'll find out).
Turns out the incubator group is also set up by infra if the incubator
is mentioned in the a
+1, and thanks for moving to a process that doesn't involve infra@ for
things the PMC can sort itself.
Craig L Russell wrote on Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 17:24:48 -0700:
> Hi Christian,
>
> The referenced guide now contains this language:
>
> After root creates the new account, the new committer need
Hi Sebb,
Please feel free to update the document as you see fit. CTR.
We all are trying to reduce ambiguity and stress in the process. Any
improvements by you are appreciated.
In this case there's no need for consensus. Just reality. ;-)
Craig
On Aug 15, 2011, at 7:15 PM, sebb wrote:
On 1
On 16 August 2011 01:24, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> The referenced guide now contains this language:
>
> After root creates the new account, the new committer needs to added to both
> the committer-? section and the podling section of the
> file:https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/i
On Aug 15, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Christian,
The referenced guide now contains this language:
Hehe, thanks for updating it. Good job!
Craig
After root creates the new account, the new committer needs to added
to both the committer-? section and the podling section
Hi Christian,
The referenced guide now contains this language:
After root creates the new account, the new committer needs to added
to both the committer-? section and the podling section of the file:https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authoriza
> It looks like someone needs to correct the guide you were following
...
Ah that explains so much. Thanks
> Most projects have a mentor who can do it, but not all mentors can. Any
> chance you could edit whichever doc you followed?
Yes, just updated with the phrase you send
>
>> Can anybody wi
Thanks Stefan!
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-08-15, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Can anybody with write access update the auth file and add "leadpipe"
>> to the OGNL podling please?
>
> Done
>
> Stefan
>
> -
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
but I have no access. According to the guide below mentors should be
able to do it but it seems there is a further restriction?
It looks like someone needs to correct the guide you were following
If you look at the recent account creation notices
On 2011-08-15, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Can anybody with write access update the auth file and add "leadpipe"
> to the OGNL podling please?
Done
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
I am looking into that now :).
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to add Luke Blanshard (leadpipe) to
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization-template
>
> but I have no access. According to
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:n...@devtech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 3:51 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Add incubator group to podling committers
>
> Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
> > I sent this to i
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> > Out of Office? Naw. As long as I have decent Internet access (and no
> > firewall
> > keeping me from SSH), I'm "in the office."
> And I was even pretty sure somebody said you were on honeymoon -
No, we actually haven't had time for other than a couple of get-aw
>> I sent this to infra, but I have been told the incubator chair should
>> handle this.
>
> I've made the changes via the command line interface.
Thank you very much Noel!
>> I have hear our inc-chair is ooo
>
> Out of Office? Naw. As long as I have decent Internet access (and no
> firewall
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I sent this to infra, but I have been told the incubator chair should
> handle this.
I've made the changes via the command line interface.
I wish there were some consistency on this when accounts are setup, but that's
something we can discuss with infra. Oft-times
Dang, that was quick! Thanks Joe!
Cheers,
Chris
On 8/8/10 1:56 PM, "Joe Schaefer" wrote:
Done.
- Original Message
> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Cc: "oodt-...@incubator.apache.org"
> Sent: Sun, August 8, 2010 4:52:48 PM
> Subject: Add k
Done.
- Original Message
> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Cc: "oodt-...@incubator.apache.org"
> Sent: Sun, August 8, 2010 4:52:48 PM
> Subject: Add kelly and woollard to incubator UNIX group
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Over in OODT land, we've recently
Sounds much better.
The key thing here is to highlight the responsibilities of the PPMC, the
mentors and the IPMC and whose votes binding (or not).
This will ensure that everybody understands what they are supposed to do.
PPMC only recommends committers and the voting in the private list is to
sho
While the subject document is being prepared, I've update the guides/
ppmc.html to add some text with the rationale of the PPMC/PMC voting
process.
The small, easy to overlook, sentence is now two paragraphs.
Voting a new committer is one of the most important functions of any
PMC, and the
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 18:14 +0100, Aidan Skinner wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you have any ideas on how to make sure that people read and understand
> > the documentation, either the existing or proposed update?
>
> I suspect it's a
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have any ideas on how to make sure that people read and understand
> the documentation, either the existing or proposed update?
I suspect it's an ordering issue (and conflation of the concept of PMC
and PPMC, rat
Hi Martijn,
On Aug 24, 2008, at 4:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
There is always a lot of confusion on whose votes are binding in our
podlings. The PPMC guide has a small, easy to overlook sentence which
states the obviously not so obvious: "And note that binding votes are
those cast by Incubat
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is always a lot of confusion on whose votes are binding in our
> podlings. The PPMC guide has a small, easy to overlook sentence which
> states the obviously not so obvious: "And note that binding votes are
> thos
Dan Diephouse wrote:
Just add yourself to the monthly schedule on the wiki and then you'll be
scheduled (pick any group you like) :-)
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
Also, new incubator projects must report every month for the first three
months. After that then the reporting
Just add yourself to the monthly schedule on the wiki and then you'll be
scheduled (pick any group you like) :-)
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
Also, new incubator projects must report every month for the first three
months. After that then the reporting schedule kicks in for
Conor MacNeill wrote:
hi Greg,
Maybe it would be a good idea to forward this or somethign similar to the
committers list. I'd say there is a number of a committers who are not
aware of these legal issues.
Whaddayareckon?
Add members to it too, please.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAI
hi Greg,
Maybe it would be a good idea to forward this or somethign similar to the
committers list. I'd say there is a number of a committers who are not
aware of these legal issues.
Whaddayareckon?
Conor
> If you don't have a binding vote, then you are not responsible. The people
> *with* th
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:43:33PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>...
> When the James project was initially looking at TLP status, Nicola Ken
> forwarded a message from Roy that included a comment to the effect that if
> Committers understood their legal exposure, they would demand TLP status,
> r
> > At some point, hopefully not too far down the pike, the
> > Committer is voted into the PMC. Until that happens,
> > the Committer does not have a binding vote. Cannot
> > have a binding vote, because to have one outside of the
> > legal structure would expose the Committer.
> Can you explai
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Committers could be given commit access long before having project
member status, and would thus be able to commit but not vote. This
makes it possible to keep a high bar for membership of the project but
a lower bar for committing.
Is this possibl
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Committers could be given commit access long before having project
> member status, and would thus be able to commit but not vote. This
> makes it possible to keep a high bar for membership of the project but
> a lower bar for committing.
>
> Is this possible/wanted?
A
On Nov 23, 2003, at 10:10 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
There is only one thing that would *really* change and that has not
been done till now.
Committers could be given commit access long before having project
member status, and would thus be able to commit but not vote. This
makes it possible
Noel made an interesting suggestion on the PMC list:
---
Alternatively, the PPMC could consist of the Incubator PMC, the destination
PMC (in cases where there is one), and project Committers. In that case,
there is a single streamlined process, without additional interconnects.
This does have the
Leo Simons wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Committers could be given commit access long before having project
member status, and would thus be able to commit but not vote. This
makes it possible to keep a high bar for membership of the project but
a lower bar for committing.
Is this possible
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Committers could be given commit access long before having project
member status, and would thus be able to commit but not vote. This
makes it possible to keep a high bar for membership of the project but
a lower bar for committing.
Is this possible/wanted?
I think I
Secondly, given the original intent of the concept of a PMC, I am
curious as to why the board permitted umbrella PMCs such as XML and
Jakarta.
The board did not create umbrella PMCs -- XML was Xerces and Jakarta
was Tomcat/Watchdog. They grew beyond that because their names implied
more, and nob
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
...
The ability to make ASF decisions starts with the board and is
delegated to officers and their associated committees. Anyone casting
binding votes (meaning votes that are counted toward making a decision)
must be listed as a member of the committee on which they are voti
Sam Ruby wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
...
Jakarta got into a weird state
wherein committer == voter and commit-access was given out like candy,
thus leading to the notion that committers run ASF projects. I don't
believe it is appropriate to link voting with cvs access.
...
P.S. Can somebody exp
Phil Steitz wrote:
...
Are you proposing that committers who are not PMC members or "Project
Committers" should not have voting rights?
On the PMC list it has come out that we were misunderstanding each other
over the term "binding votes".
Let me explain what we said.
Some talked about a vote m
Roy,
Thankyou. Read with great interest, and it put a few things into
perspective. Particularly the fact that to me the Practice PMCs made no
sense from my perspective (based in the XML project's world). I think I
now understand why.
Couple of things came to mind whilst I was ruminating on
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Geir has proposed that we create practice PMCs (a.k.a. subprojects)
as part of incubation, and that we call them "Project Committers"
lists rather than PMCs. I am +1 on the notion in general, but I
would prefer to call them core groups instead. My rationale is that
"commit
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
[Moved from the PMC list -- folks have got to stop proposing such
things on the wrong list.]
A long time ago, the name PMC was created in an attempt to genericize
the way that the Apache Group operated, using terminology that would be
easily understood by a judge or IRS inspe
64 matches
Mail list logo
