- Original Message
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, September 16, 2010 7:40:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Benson Margulies
>wrote:
> > ...It takes about
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> ...It takes about two minutes to make a JIRA. If
> the contributor can't spare those two minutes, how are they having time to
> make a patch at all?...
> ...Perhaps this is because I'm accustomed, at both my day job and on several
> Apach
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 19:41 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > This seems a very workable approach - going through Jira for everything
> > is too much work on the part of the contributer.
>
>
> On the one hand, I want to stand off and let any community make its own way
> within the l
- Original Message
> From: Craig L Russell
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 8:05:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
>
>
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > - Original Mess
On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: David Lutterkort
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 7:33:45 PM
Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
FWIW, what
>
>
>
> This seems a very workable approach - going through Jira for everything
> is too much work on the part of the contributer.
On the one hand, I want to stand off and let any community make its own way
within the light constraints of the license policy. On the other hand, I am
honestly mysti
- Original Message
> From: David Lutterkort
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 7:33:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
>
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > FWIW, what Subversio
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> FWIW, what Subversion uses:
>
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/community-guide.html#patches
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/community-guide.html#patch-manager
>
> Briefly, all patches go to dev@, and
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> All patches should be attached to JIRAs with the 'grant' checkbox checked.
> Only if they are large do you then have to contemplate asking for a CLA and
> going through the clearance process. Or so I understand it.
Sounds good, and as it'
> a working system involving an official mailing list, you have a working
> > system.
> >
> > On the other hand, I think that we all agree that a patch mailed by
> > personal email to a committer who commits it is not a good thing.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Benson Margulies wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 22:03:12 -0400:
> However, I thank Joe for pointing out that I was careful to avoid stating a
> requirement when I didn't know that one existed.
>
Thanks for clarifying. To summarize, having all patches go via JIRA is
one possible way of working, bu
ve
> a working system involving an official mailing list, you have a working
> system.
>
> On the other hand, I think that we all agree that a patch mailed by
> personal email to a committer who commits it is not a good thing.
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> -
h mailed by personal
email to a committer who commits it is not a good thing.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Daniel Shahaf
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 9:43:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: Accepting patches in
om: Daniel Shahaf
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 9:43:09 PM
> Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
>
> So each patch /must/ go via JIRA and get some checkbox filled?
> Seriously?
>
> 1. Over at Subversion, the practice has been to jus
So each patch /must/ go via JIRA and get some checkbox filled?
Seriously?
1. Over at Subversion, the practice has been to just say thankyou and
commit the patches. A few times, with large-scale contributions (eg:
someone sent us an SQL backend), we have required filing an ICLA first
--- but that
David,
Yes, current practice is exactly what Benson outlined.
thanks,
dims
On 09/13/2010 08:58 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
All patches should be attached to JIRAs with the 'grant' checkbox checked.
Only if they are large do you then have to contemplate asking for a CLA and
going through the cl
All patches should be attached to JIRAs with the 'grant' checkbox checked.
Only if they are large do you then have to contemplate asking for a CLA and
going through the clearance process. Or so I understand it.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:55 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> What is the offical proces
17 matches
Mail list logo
