On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Yes, though jars don't work as well for packaging... let's drop the
> other mailing lists (left on BCC to let them know they are being
> dropped ;-) ) and move to just jszip-...@googlegroups.com
>
> On 1 June 2012 15:24, LeClaire Garvin wr
On 02/06/2012, at 12:30 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> Oh I know about that but it prevents the live editing that is possible
> by using the jszip packaging type.
With the MJS setup, it is normal to edit the js files having previously invoked
"mvn jetty:run" on the command line. In another termina
Hi Stephen,
Not sure if you know, but the JS Import project (1) can already utilise zip
files with a "www" classifier. The regular Assembly plugin can be used to make
these packages. The following type of dependency declaration can then be made:
org.code
I think there is also some overlap with the web jar repository
(https://github.com/webjars/webjars.github.com) project
Regards,
Garvin LeClaire
garvin.lecla...@gmail.com
On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Christopher Hunt wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Not sure if you know, but the JS Import project (1) can
Yes, though jars don't work as well for packaging... let's drop the
other mailing lists (left on BCC to let them know they are being
dropped ;-) ) and move to just jszip-...@googlegroups.com
On 1 June 2012 15:24, LeClaire Garvin wrote:
> I think there is also some overlap with the web jar reposit
On 1 June 2012 15:19, Christopher Hunt wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Not sure if you know, but the JS Import project (1) can already utilise zip
> files with a "www" classifier. The regular Assembly plugin can be used to
> make these packages. The following type of dependency declaration can then be
