On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> A list of people on the Incubator PMC is here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html
Ok, thanks for the hint. That settles it:
- We have three binding +1 votes: Robert, Stefan, Kevan
- We also have two non-binding +1 votes: Sebb's and m
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>>> Ok, that brings up the question whether these three votes are sufficient.
>>>
>> I can add +1, with the proviso that the (C) year must be corrected for
>> the next release.
>>
>> I don't know if my +1 counts though.
>
> T
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Ok, that brings up the question whether these three votes are sufficient.
>>
>
> I can add +1, with the proviso that the (C) year must be corrected for
> the next release.
>
> I don't know if my +1 counts though.
Thanks, the change for the year was
On 02/04/2009, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> >> wrote:
> >>> where are we with this?
> >>>
> >>> are we
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> wrote:
>>> where are we with this?
>>>
>>> are we cutting another release candidate or shall i take a look this one
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> where are we with this?
>>
>> are we cutting another release candidate or shall i take a look this one?
>
> The only problem pointed out so far was the invalid year in the co
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> where are we with this?
>
> are we cutting another release candidate or shall i take a look this one?
The only problem pointed out so far was the invalid year in the copyright. See
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--VOTE--apache-rat-pr
where are we with this?
are we cutting another release candidate or shall i take a look this one?
- robert
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-03-19, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
>> I have prepared a new staging repository, which you can find on
>
>> https
On 2009-03-19, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Hi,
> I have prepared a new staging repository, which you can find on
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-51670640d59ff2/
> The proposed binary and source files are in the subdirectory
> org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.6/
a who
On Mar 19, 2009, at 4:43 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Kevan Miller
wrote:
Hi Jochen,
In addition to the copyright date, when I build locally, some of
the jars
are not being generated with a
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> Hi Jochen,
>> In addition to the copyright date, when I build locally, some of the jars
>> are not being generated with all of the required LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER
>> files.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Hi Jochen,
> In addition to the copyright date, when I build locally, some of the jars
> are not being generated with all of the required LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER
> files. However, looks like your generated binaries are correct. On my
> sys
Hi Jochen,
In addition to the copyright date, when I build locally, some of the
jars are not being generated with all of the required LICENSE, NOTICE,
DISCLAIMER files. However, looks like your generated binaries are
correct. On my system:
apache-rat/target/apache-rat-0.6.jar does not incl
On 19/03/2009, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a new staging repository, which you can find on
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-51670640d59ff2/
>
> The proposed binary and source files are in the subdirectory
>
> org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.6/
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
