Thanks for the vote! I know, I didn't like how the thread evolved this time
but I know how to handle it better for the next release. :)
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Changing my vote to +1 binding.
>
> For the next release you might want to consider voting on
Hi,
Changing my vote to +1 binding.
For the next release you might want to consider voting on each RC separately,
it makes reviewing votes a lot easier. Some projects allow votes to carry over
if changes are trivial between RCs, you might want to consider that. This is
basically what you did h
Hi Justin,
The difference between RC2 and RC1 was trivial. As said before in this
thread, I only removed some redundant development dependencies. A diff
between the two versions is available at [4].
Thanks,
Radu
[4] - https://gist.github.com/raducotescu/f876348e82183d412a3d
On Wed, Jul 30, 201
Hi Radu,
> 3. browsermap-1.4.1-rc2-incubating: one +1 (Kevan Miller) - I removed some
> redundant development dependencies
So you saying RC2 did only get +1 vote, not the needed 3 +1 votes by the
PPMC/IPMC before being voted on by the incubator.
What are the changes between RC1 and RC2? Are the
One of my guys over here in the office... sorry about that :-)
John
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Thanks for the vote!
>
> BTW, who's Rahul? :P
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:35 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > Rahul,
> >
> > Typically, the subject format is [RESULT
Thanks for the vote!
BTW, who's Rahul? :P
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:35 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Rahul,
>
> Typically, the subject format is [RESULT] [VOTE]
>
> Anyways that's a minor formality.
>
> +1 binding on the release. It looks good to me.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Radu
Rahul,
Typically, the subject format is [RESULT] [VOTE]
Anyways that's a minor formality.
+1 binding on the release. It looks good to me.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> The vote result is at [3].
>
> Thanks,
> Radu
>
> [3] - http://devicemap.markmail.org/thread/wcgy
The vote result is at [3].
Thanks,
Radu
[3] - http://devicemap.markmail.org/thread/wcgyx2gbxsn3ef5f
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:57 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Radu,
>
> I think what Justin (and even myself) is looking for is a link to the
> thread with the vote result.
>
> John
Radu,
I think what Justin (and even myself) is looking for is a link to the
thread with the vote result.
John
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> We've had three voting sessions in the thread from [2] until we got
> everything right with rc2:
>
> 1. browserm
Hi Justin,
We've had three voting sessions in the thread from [2] until we got
everything right with rc2:
1. browsermap-1.4.1-incubating: three +1 (Werner Keil, Reza Naghibi,
Eberhard Speer Jr.) and one -1 (Bertrand Delacretaz, for not complying with
RAT policies and for including derived files f
Hi,
> You mean https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/devicemap/ , right?
Yes that's the correct URL. Not a blocker IMO as it can be moved to the correct
location once the vote is over.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> ...To be fixed in next release:
> The RC should be hosted on
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/devicemap...
You mean https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/devicemap/ , right?
dist/release is for once the vo
Hi,
+0 binding. I consider changing to +1 if some one posts a [VOTE][RESULT]
clearly indicating how many votes RC2 actually got and/or explain the situation.
- vote thread may have issues (see below)
- signatures are hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE all good
- release artefac
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> ...We voted on our project's list [2] for these release artifacts
> and got four +1, out of which two are from Incubator's PMC members Bertrand
> Delacretaz and Kevan Miller...
So we need just one additional vote, if someone has time to
14 matches
Mail list logo
