Thanks for taking a look Roman. I have filed the following JIRA about the
gradle.properties issue you raised:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-136
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - checked sigs
> - LICENSES/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER look good
>
+1 (binding)
- checked sigs
- LICENSES/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER look good
- Headers look good
- checked for the release tag in Git
- offending (cat X) material got removed, but otherwise git tag
matches release tarball
Thanks,
Roman.
P.S. Weirdly gradle.properties is set to non-release on tag -- you ma
+1 (binding)
- Sigs/asc look good
- NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER look good
- Licenses look good
- Tests succeed
- Gradle binaries not included
Good work.
-Jakob
On 24 January 2018 at 13:01, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Hi, it's been almost 72 hours since the vote was opened. How many votes do
>
Hi,
> Hi, it's been almost 72 hours since the vote was opened. How many votes do
> we need for this to pass? Can other folks take a look if necessary?
I suggest asking your mentor who are IPMC member to vote.
Thanks,
Justin
-
Hi, it's been almost 72 hours since the vote was opened. How many votes do
we need for this to pass? Can other folks take a look if necessary?
Thanks,
Matt
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signature and hash
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hashes good
- disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- no unexpected binary files
- can compile from source
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-
