I am OK with that, but lets give a last chance for any last comments or
reviews from other IPMC members, I know this looks like *strictly*
following the rules, but IMHO there is no harm in that :).
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> +1
>
> imo we can easily just start calling
+1
Am 03.01.12 16:17, schrieb Mohammad Nour El-Din:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
Bean Validation, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it
is time or not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE], [4], whi
+1
imo we can easily just start calling the VOTE. BVAL and the resolution has been
on spot several times.
So I'd say we just move the last resolution text to our Wiki and do an internal
review for fixing the last itches and scratches.
Then we can formally call the VOTE and are done.
LieGru
+1
Matt
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
> Bean Validation, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it
> is time or not, [1], [2] and [3].
> In the past few weeks there ha
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
>... The Apache Bean Validation community sees it is time to request an IPMC
> [VOTE] on recommending this resolution [7] to the ASF board.
>
> Accordingly, would you please cast your vote:
>
> [X ] +1 to recommend Bean Validation's gradu
