The vote passes with five +1 votes (four binding) and no -1 votes. Thanks,
everyone. FWIW, I did appreciate seeing the +1 votes. Thank you.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 8:47 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> I’ve wondered for many years if the decision to do IP CLEARANCE in the
> Incubator is the best choice f
I’ve wondered for many years if the decision to do IP CLEARANCE in the
Incubator is the best choice for the Foundation. The whole recording is an
arcane xml/forrest based process that is nearly 20 years old.
It hasn’t been a burning issue for me, but I wonder.
Best,
Dave
> On Sep 25, 2024, at
That's right Dave, but as I checked the ip clearance statement, I just
wanted to say that it looks good to me :)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 6:14 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> The long-standing tradition for IP CLEARANCE is LAZY CONSENSUS.
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> > On Sep 24, 2024, at 9:09 AM,
+1 (binding)
On Wed, 25 Sept 2024 at 01:10, Julian Hyde wrote:
> > The long-standing tradition for IP CLEARANCE is LAZY CONSENSUS.
>
> Yes, but it's still good to see a few votes in the affirmative. It
> means that someone is doing diligence.
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 9:15 AM Dave Fisher wrot
> The long-standing tradition for IP CLEARANCE is LAZY CONSENSUS.
Yes, but it's still good to see a few votes in the affirmative. It
means that someone is doing diligence.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 9:15 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> The long-standing tradition for IP CLEARANCE is LAZY CONSENSUS.
>
> T
