Re: third party tooling.

2015-08-06 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik >> wrote: >> > ...you can call yourself open source software all you want, >> > but unless you get an exception from Fedora Pack

Re: third party tooling.

2015-08-06 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> ...you can call yourself open source software all you want, >> but unless you get an exception from Fedora Packaging Committee >> you are not open enough for the distribution t

RE: third party tooling.

2015-08-06 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
] Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2015 02:13 To: general@incubator.apache.org; ro...@shaposhnik.org Subject: Re: third party tooling. On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > ...you can call yourself open

Re: third party tooling.

2015-08-06 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > ...you can call yourself open source software all you want, > > but unless you get an exception from Fedora Packaging Committee > > you are not open enough for the distribut

Re: third party tooling.

2015-08-06 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > ...you can call yourself open source software all you want, > but unless you get an exception from Fedora Packaging Committee > you are not open enough for the distribution to consider your work... But that's doesn't make your project inva

Re: third party tooling.

2015-08-05 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Roman Shaposhnik wrote in reply to jan i: > >> I'm not aware of any policy like that. That said, I'd say the rule in my book >> is very close to Linux packaging guidelines. Open source software *must* >> be bootsrappable from source using *o

Re: third party tooling.

2015-08-05 Thread Marvin Humphrey
jan i wrote: >> I want to make sure I have not overlooked a policy or rule. Corinthia is not required to be compatible with any particular platform. Consider why this is desirable: one might provide open source code which only works with a proprietary compiler, and then someone else might take yo

Re: third party tooling.

2015-08-05 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:50 PM, jan i wrote: > On 5 August 2015 at 22:46, Dennis E. Hamilton > wrote: > >> I don't have an answer about tooling with respect to the need for >> widely-available tools. If the concern is for ability to use free tools on >> Windows, but there are alternatives to req

Re: third party tooling.

2015-08-05 Thread jan i
On 5 August 2015 at 22:46, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I don't have an answer about tooling with respect to the need for > widely-available tools. If the concern is for ability to use free tools on > Windows, but there are alternatives to requiring an expensive commercial > IDE for users while s

RE: third party tooling.

2015-08-05 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
I don't have an answer about tooling with respect to the need for widely-available tools. If the concern is for ability to use free tools on Windows, but there are alternatives to requiring an expensive commercial IDE for users while still taking advantage of the Microsoft development tool chai