Surajit Dash wrote:
> I'm confused after seeing this message. Does it mean FTPServer is no
> longer a part of the Apache open source projects and will not be
> supported in the developer community anymore?
> We are planning to use the Incubator FTPServer as a production FTP
> Server. Should we re
> In fact, the ASL/CLA combo is a bit ambigous on [copyright]
Not really, but not well understood. Expect to see a a document clarifying
the matters.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Hi,
I'm confused after seeing this message. Does it mean FTPServer is no
longer a part of the Apache open source projects and will not be
supported in the developer community anymore?
We are planning to use the Incubator FTPServer as a production FTP
Server. Should we refrain from doing so. Also
On Thursday 04 November 2004 10:54, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> > 1. The Copyright *owner* of any work is the producer of the Original
> > Work.
> > 2. Any contributor agrees that each and every part of contribution to
> > the Original Work, becomes part of the Original Work.
> >
> > = I don't own my pa
Niclas Hedhman wrote on Wednesday, November 03, 2004 11:36 AM:
> On Thursday 04 November 2004 02:11, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
>>> What about code that was contributed during Incubation?
>>
>> They would have to obtain a license from the ASF to use that code,
>> or, in alternative, a license fr
Adding my $0.02. IANAL, just a guy who deals with this stuff a
lot:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote on Wednesday, November 03, 2004 10:11 AM:
> J Aaron Farr wrote:
>
>> Let's say a group of developers bring an LGPL'd project to Apache
>> called JExample from jexample.sf.net.
>
> Ok.
>
>> So they co
On Thursday 04 November 2004 02:11, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> > What about code that was contributed during Incubation?
>
> They would have to obtain a license from the ASF to use that code, or,
> in alternative, a license from each invididual contributor. Since that
> license comes along with th
J Aaron Farr wrote:
Let's say a group of developers bring an LGPL'd project to Apache called
JExample from jexample.sf.net.
Ok.
So they convert the license to ASL 2.0 and
go through all the other hoops but after six months or so, things have
stalled and it's apparent the project isn't ready for t
> -Original Message-
> From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > So, can I use such project name and move all code to SF?
>
> No.
>
> It would require explicit permission from the ASF.
> I have no idea how easy that would be, but my guess is; Fairly difficult.
Well, it depends.
On Thursday 04 November 2004 00:22, Sergey M Vladimirov wrote:
> NH> No problem. Just follow the ASL 2.0 license, which effectively allows
> you to NH> do whatever you like as long as you don't remove the Copyright
> and don't use NH> the Apache brand names. See the header in source files
> for lo
On Wednesday 03 November 2004 23:42, Sergey M Vladimirov wrote:
> Question: what if I want to continue working on FTPServer?
>
> Can I continue working with it on SourceForge? (I have no access to
> Apache CVS, and my patches on JIRA goes nowhere).
No problem. Just follow the ASL 2.0 license, whi
> IMHO we now have to decide what to do with FTPServer and AltRMI, which
> seem dormant
I have asked Paul about AltRMI, and he was actively trying to build
Community as of even a few months ago, but has diverted his attention to
POJOifying Avalon apps. If I recall correctly, FTPServer is his test
On Wednesday 03 November 2004 18:54, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> IMHO we now have to decide what to do with FTPServer and AltRMI, which
> seem dormant and are in a similar state. In particular I'm asking this
> to the Mentors and developers of these two projects.
Yes, if these two are not conside
13 matches
Mail list logo
