Thanks for all the hard work Roman!
- Henry
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> when a honor of the IPMC chair was bestowed on
> me beginning of 2014 it was crucial that the
> position remains to be rotated among IPMC members.
> As an aside: while Marvin felt that
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ...First of all, I really appreciate the positive feedback on my tenure
> expressed on this thread
Hey it looks like I missed this one: big thanks Roman for your work here!
Leaving so soon, really? ;-)
-Bertrand
Hi!
I think this thread has achieved its goal and the real discussion
is now happening on the thread re: Benson's proposal. I couldn't
have asked for more -- lets move the real discussion over there.
Before we do that, however, I wanted to make a few quick remarks.
First of all, I really apprecia
On Dec 31, 2014, at 5:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> when a honor of the IPMC chair was bestowed on
> me beginning of 2014 it was crucial that the
> position remains to be rotated among IPMC members.
> As an aside: while Marvin felt that the ideal rotation period
> was 6 month my personal bel
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> You might push
> back on the board, formally, and challenge them to either officially
> be discontented or leave the iPMC alone.
I've been defending the Incubator before the Board for some time. I actually
called in to the December Board
On 01/01/2015 08:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I'd like to raise a topic directly related to the succession. To
start, three cheers for Roman for all his hard work!
cheers += 3;
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr
From: Marvin Humphrey<mailto:mar...@rectangular.com>
Sent: 1/1/2015 7:51 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org<mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Reflections from the outgoing Chair
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> three cheers for Roman f
Marvin,
I did go away. I came back to help with a podling, and fell into a
conversation started by discontented board members. You might push
back on the board, formally, and challenge them to either officially
be discontented or leave the iPMC alone. Me, I have an idea for a
proposal that might m
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> three cheers for Roman for all his hard work!
+1!
+1!
+1!
> For all other projects in the Foundation, we say, 'The chair is just a
> clerk who facilitates communications with the board.' Here at the
> IPMC, we expect the chair to be mode
I'd like to raise a topic directly related to the succession. To
start, three cheers for Roman for all his hard work!
For all other projects in the Foundation, we say, 'The chair is just a
clerk who facilitates communications with the board.' Here at the
IPMC, we expect the chair to be moderator o
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> The incubator PMC does fulfill one important role, that of being a
> vettor of releases. It doesn't always do it well, but sometimes it does.
> The scenario you describe above would put that responsibility entirely
> upon the mentors.
>
> I would
The incubator PMC does fulfill one important role, that of being a
vettor of releases. It doesn't always do it well, but sometimes it does.
The scenario you describe above would put that responsibility entirely
upon the mentors.
I would argue though, that it doesn't require a 100+ committee to ful
Roman,
Thank you for your time as the chair. I eagerly look forward to the point
where there is no need for the IPMC.
John
On Wed Dec 31 2014 at 8:27:54 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> when a honor of the IPMC chair was bestowed on
> me beginning of 2014 it was crucial that the
> positi
13 matches
Mail list logo
