Re: Dormancy

2006-07-18 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 08:24, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On 7/17/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Or do we just turn > > them off, with a bounce notice that people interested in resurrecting the > > project contact us on [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > That's probably the easiest thing to

Re: Dormancy

2006-07-17 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Noel J. Bergman wrote: We have several projects that appear to be dormant, so let's discuss what that means in terms of operational mechanics. Usually a project requests to change their status to abandoned/dormant, but a gentle ping if we don't see two status reports over two months, or any oth

Re: Dormancy

2006-07-17 Thread Matthieu Riou
The interest around the BPEL implementation in Agila has mostly moved to Ode and the workflow part isn't evolving so declaring the project as dormant sounds fair enough. As for the policy, wouldn't it be possible to do a two step thing? Like: 1. Make svn read-only and the mailing-list subscriber

Re: Dormancy

2006-07-17 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 7/17/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Garrett Rooney wrote: > FWIW, It's merely the lack of a clue as to what needs to be changed > that's kept me from closing down lucene4c. That, and Agila and a couple of others, prompted my e-mail. > > I'd suggest that the PMC declare a pr

RE: Dormancy

2006-07-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Garrett Rooney wrote: > FWIW, It's merely the lack of a clue as to what needs to be changed > that's kept me from closing down lucene4c. That, and Agila and a couple of others, prompted my e-mail. > > I'd suggest that the PMC declare a project as dormant, with the effect being > > that we set t

Re: Dormancy

2006-07-17 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 7/17/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Or do we just turn them off, with a bounce notice that people interested in resurrecting the project contact us on [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's probably the easiest thing to do. -- justin --

Re: Dormancy

2006-07-17 Thread J Aaron Farr
On 7/17/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd suggest that the PMC declare a project as dormant, with the effect being that we set the SVN ACL to read-only. If people want to wake the project up, we can change the ACL. +1 I'm not sure what would be best for the mailing list. If

Re: Dormancy

2006-07-17 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 7/17/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We have several projects that appear to be dormant, so let's discuss what that means in terms of operational mechanics. FWIW, It's merely the lack of a clue as to what needs to be changed that's kept me from closing down lucene4c. Well, th