Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-21 Thread James Bognar
@Niall, Thanks for your interest. Other current ideas for development 1) MessagePack support. 2) YAML support. 3) Convert microservice API to be OSGi-based. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:52 PM, James Bognar > > wrote: > > > Hi all, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-20 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:52 PM, James Bognar wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose Juneau to be an Apache Incubator project. > > Juneau is a toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content > types using a common framework, and for creating sophisticated > self-documenting REST inte

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-20 Thread John D. Ament
I think we should plan to start a vote on this. Anyone see a reason not to? Thank you for those who have looked. i was able to replicate the issue Dennis mentioned with the download, will need to look though I suspect it may be an upstream issue. Also thank you kindly to Craig for stepping up a

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-20 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:27 PM, James Bognar wrote: > @Stian, > > I've removed references to "Apache" from the temp site and removing all > links to the GitHub repo. The only thing I can't change is the google site > URL https://sites.google.com/site/apachejuneau/. Hopefully this is okay > unti

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-20 Thread James Bognar
@Stian, I've removed references to "Apache" from the temp site and removing all links to the GitHub repo. The only thing I can't change is the google site URL https://sites.google.com/site/apachejuneau/. Hopefully this is okay until I can delete the site once Incubation is approved? On Sun, J

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-19 Thread James Bognar
@Stian, Thanks for joining! I'll remove the references to Apache from the site. I'm new to the process and thought I could get a leg-up by rebranding it before incubation. The Google site and GitHub repo are temporary for the proposal only. I'll clean up the references. If we're accepted into

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-19 Thread John D. Ament
Stian, You would be a welcome addition as an unofficial mentor to the project. I hope you can bring your growing expertise to the team! John On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 9:00 PM Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > This sounds very interesting; would you add me as an informal mentor? (I'm > afraid I am no

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-18 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
This sounds very interesting; would you add me as an informal mentor? (I'm afraid I am not eligible to be a capital-M Mentor :-) I see you are interested in minimising dependencies and use Apache Jena, perhaps there could also be potential for overlap with Apache Commons RDF, which we are evolving

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-16 Thread James Bognar
6, at 2:02 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton < >> dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: James Bognar [mailto:james.bog...@salesforce.com] >> >> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:51 >&

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-16 Thread James Bognar
t; > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: James Bognar [mailto:james.bog...@salesforce.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:51 > >> To: general@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incu

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-16 Thread Craig Russell
une 16, 2016 12:51 >> To: general@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal >> >> The list of POJOs supported is listed here: >> >> http://jamesbognar.github.io/juneau-docs/doc/overview- >> summary.html#Core

RE: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-16 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: James Bognar [mailto:james.bog...@salesforce.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:51 > To: general@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal > > The list of POJOs supported is l

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-16 Thread James Bognar
ion is from Windows Defender using Internet Explorer 11 on >> Microsoft Windows 10 Pro x64. >> >> It would be helpful, perhaps, if the JavaDocs were accessible via HTTP >> directly. >> >> Having said all of that, this is certainly an interesting prospect. &

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-16 Thread James Bognar
es Bognar [mailto:james.bog...@salesforce.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:09 > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal > > > > FYIhere's the content of the proposal. > > > > = Juneau

RE: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-16 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
ailto:james.bog...@salesforce.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:09 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal > > FYIhere's the content of the proposal. > > = Juneau Toolkit = > > == Abstract == > > Apach

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-16 Thread Craig Russell
Sounds interesting. Sign me up to mentor. Craig > On Jun 16, 2016, at 9:52 AM, James Bognar wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose Juneau to be an Apache Incubator project. > > Juneau is a toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content > types using a common framework, and for

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

2016-06-16 Thread James Bognar
FYIhere's the content of the proposal. = Juneau Toolkit = == Abstract == Apache Juneau is a toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content types using a common framework, and for creating sophisticated self-documenting REST interfaces and microservices using VERY little code. ==