Re: Quick project submission question

2010-09-08 Thread Carl Trieloff
On 09/08/2010 11:06 AM, Scott Wilson wrote: On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:40, Carl Trieloff wrote: > On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote: >> On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote: >> >> >>> What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial co

Re: Quick project submission question

2010-09-08 Thread Scott Wilson
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:40, Carl Trieloff wrote: > On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote: >> On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote: >> >> >>> What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial >>> components >>> that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the

Re: Quick project submission question

2010-09-08 Thread Carl Trieloff
On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote: On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote: What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial components that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not coping the code, but using components that hav

Re: Quick project submission question

2010-09-08 Thread Scott Wilson
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote: > > What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial > components > that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not > coping the > code, but using components that have been built and maintained elsewhere

Quick project submission question

2010-09-08 Thread Carl Trieloff
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial components that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not coping the code, but using components that have been built and maintained elsewhere under ASL but used as dependencies for running. I assu