Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Okay, but just to mention one of my pet peeves: "refactoring" projects
into independent components within an open source project is like polishing
rocks: the result may be a bunch of really cool stones, but that will still
suck if what the user actually wants is a stone wall.
On Dec 30, 2004, at 10:26 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I believe that there are some misunderstandings. There is an
architecture
for a unified Directory Server. That server is made from a number of
components: the core JNDI backend, the local JNDI code, the network
support,
ASN.1 encoding support
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> FYI, I really don't like this trend of independent projects being
> created within umbrella projects. If you are creating a generic
> toolkit then it should be incubated as a separate project. IMO
> there are too many single-developer products being masked under
> the Di
On Dec 28, 2004, at 6:22 PM, Trustin Lee wrote:
I'm the author of MINA (Multipurpose Infrastructure for Network
Applications) subproject in Apache Directory project. We are checking
our project names before releasing them. I checked the name 'MINA',
and I found three trademark holders. None of t
Hi.
I'm the author of MINA (Multipurpose Infrastructure for Network
Applications) subproject in Apache Directory project. We are checking
our project names before releasing them. I checked the name 'MINA',
and I found three trademark holders. None of them are software or IT
companies.
I found
