Changshin Lee wrote:
> Quick question - Is the project going to be a JBI (JSR 208)
> implementation?
>
The design of the code we are contributing is intended to support
multiple container models. At this time there is an implementation of a
very simple Java container but some experiments have be
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=JBI+IBM+BEA :)
On 11/30/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is the project going to be a JBI (JSR 208) implementation?
>
> Oddly, IBM is conspicuous by its surprising absence from that JSR's expert
> group.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
>
IIRC, IBM was part of that EG, but left it.
geir
On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is the project going to be a JBI (JSR 208) implementation?
Oddly, IBM is conspicuous by its surprising absence from that JSR's
expert
group.
--- Noel
--
> Is the project going to be a JBI (JSR 208) implementation?
Oddly, IBM is conspicuous by its surprising absence from that JSR's expert
group.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
Quick question - Is the project going to be a JBI (JSR 208)
implementation?
Cheers,
Ias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
