RE: XMLBeans performance and source code status [Re: Proposal: XMLBeans]

2003-07-07 Thread Eric Vasilik
OTECTED] Subject: Re: XMLBeans performance and source code status [Re: Proposal: XMLBeans] Eric, What's the relationship between XmlCursor and the JSR-173 Streaming API for XML? Ted Eric Vasilik wrote: >When working with XMLBeans in a strongly typed way (with a Schema), individual >obj

Re: XMLBeans performance and source code status [Re: Proposal: XMLBeans]

2003-07-06 Thread Aleksander Slominski
David Bau wrote: >Adding a few links and other info - > >Eric Vasilik writes: > >>The synchronization described refers to the fact >>that one may manipulate the XML via the XmlCursor >>or the strongly typed XMLBean classes generated from >>the schema > > >As Eric says, we don't want to confuse the

Re: XMLBeans performance and source code status [Re: Proposal: XMLBeans]

2003-07-06 Thread Ted Leung
Eric, What's the relationship between XmlCursor and the JSR-173 Streaming API for XML? Ted Eric Vasilik wrote: When working with XMLBeans in a strongly typed way (with a Schema), individual objects are created for each piece of information, usually instances of simple and complex Schema types.

RE: XMLBeans performance and source code status [Re: Proposal: XMLBeans]

2003-07-05 Thread Eric Vasilik
ect: XMLBeans performance and source code status [Re: Proposal: XMLBeans] Cliff Schmidt wrote: >>What's compelling about XMLBeans compared to some of the other front >>runners, such as JDOM and XOM, Castor and JAXB? >> >> > >The main difference between XMLBea

XMLBeans performance and source code status [Re: Proposal: XMLBeans]

2003-07-04 Thread Aleksander Slominski
Cliff Schmidt wrote: What's compelling about XMLBeans compared to some of the other front runners, such as JDOM and XOM, Castor and JAXB? The main difference between XMLBeans and JDOM or XOM is that XMLBeans does not create objects for each XML information item. Instead, it provides cursor-

RE: Proposal: XMLBeans

2003-07-03 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:02 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote: > On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:26 PM, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote: >> Do you have a roadmap of where you would like this project to be in 6 >> months? A year? Two years? > > Yes - and I will post it shortly on the Wiki site. I've just p

RE: Proposal: XMLBeans

2003-07-03 Thread Cliff Schmidt
(copying the other lists, by request) Thanks for all the good questions and advice, Howard. Please let me know if the following leaves you with other questions or concerns. On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:26 PM, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote: >> See [http://workshop.bea.com/xmlbeans/quickStart.jsp B

Proposal: XMLBeans

2003-07-02 Thread Cliff Schmidt
Hi, I would like to propose a new subproject to further develop XMLBeans, which is a Java-XML binding tool that also allows low-level access to the full XML instance Infoset. The technology was developed by BEA, but we believe this work could potentially be a good fit for either the Jakarta or