Re: Project probe: AsyncFlows Framework

2018-09-12 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:09 PM Dmitriy Pavlov wrote: > ...If there are no sufficient volunteers involved, the project has a high risk > that development is stopped and the project is retired... More precisely, an Apache project requires at least 3 active PMC members [1] to operate. So, whe

Re: Project probe: AsyncFlows Framework

2018-09-12 Thread Dmitriy Pavlov
Hi Constantine, Anyway, thank you for bringing this idea here. I hope the project will find enthusiasts. About similar projects, it's totally not a problem. Let's Darwin decide. About community. Unfortunately, it is a paramount thing in Apache projects. If there are no sufficient volunteers invo

Re: Project probe: AsyncFlows Framework

2018-09-10 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Constantine, I took a few minutes to look into your project. You have some interesting ideas. You might want to look into the features of some current Apache projects and incubator podlings. (1) Events Pulsar Kafka ActiveMQ (2) Topologies Storm Heron Airflow I’m sure there are many. Regards

Re: Project probe: AsyncFlows Framework

2018-09-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > 3. Is the project suitable for Apach Incubator considering that there are > already projects for the similar domain at Apache? We don’t care if there are similar project already incubator or exist as top level projects. > 4. Is the project suitable for Apache Incubator considering the cur

Project probe: AsyncFlows Framework

2018-09-10 Thread Constantine Plotnikov
Hello All! I would like to probe if there is interest in the project AsyncFlows that define DSL for asynchronous programming. The project is approximately the same domain as Netty, MINA, HttpCore Async, Vert.X - asynchronous network applications. However I belive tha the project provides higher le