Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-08-08 Thread ant elder
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:04 AM, ant elder wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Marvin Humphrey > > wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:24 AM, ant elder wrote: > >> > I've been away so a little slow in finishing this but i

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-08-06 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:04 AM, ant elder wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:24 AM, ant elder wrote: >> > I've been away so a little slow in finishing this but i have just now made >> > an update to the guide, see >> > http://svn.a

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-08-06 Thread ant elder
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:24 AM, ant elder wrote: > > I've been away so a little slow in finishing this but i have just now made > > an update to the guide, see > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1508433 > > I guess

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-08-03 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > ...going > forward, I'd like to suggest that we try to harmonize Incubator podling > reporting with the Board's guidelines for TLPs +1 assuming the docs are updated to reflect this. -Bertrand -

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-07-31 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:24 AM, ant elder wrote: > I've been away so a little slow in finishing this but i have just now made > an update to the guide, see > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1508433 I guess preserving the 2010 status quo was too much too much to ask for. :) >

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-07-30 Thread ant elder
I've been away so a little slow in finishing this but i have just now made an update to the guide, see http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1508433 This does not include anything yet for the request from Bertrand to still require at least one mentor vote but instead goes more toward

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-07-15 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:04 PM, ant elder wrote: > Ok seems everyone so far is ok with changing this, so how far can this go... Whatever happens, IMO we must still require at least one mentor vote on podling committers elections - if only to make sure mentors are listening. -Bertrand -

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-07-12 Thread ant elder
elder > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:04 PM > > Subject: Re: Podling new committer votes > > > > Ok seems everyone so far is ok with changing this, so how far can this > go... > > > > In the "

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-07-10 Thread Joe Schaefer
rs through lazy consensus alone. IOW +1 to roll back to pre-May 1, 2007. - Original Message - > From: ant elder > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:04 PM > Subject: Re: Podling new committer votes > > Ok seems everyone so far

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-07-10 Thread ant elder
Ok seems everyone so far is ok with changing this, so how far can this go... In the "experiment" Joe commented "...basically rolling back the clock to May 1, 2007 on guides/ppmc.html" which is this change http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/guides/ppmc.xml?r1=517024&r2=5428

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-07-09 Thread Ross Gardler
Great archeology On 9 Jul 2013 18:02, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, ant elder wrote: > > Looking at the "Voting in a new committer" section at > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html i see that its been > > updated since i last looked and now says the Incuba

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-07-09 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, ant elder wrote: > Looking at the "Voting in a new committer" section at > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html i see that its been > updated since i last looked and now says the Incubator PMC should be > notified twice when a podling is voting in a new comm

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-07-09 Thread Ross Gardler
+1 the IPMC should not be interfering and thus there is no need to be involved. Mentors should be monitoring podling activity. IPMC members with an interest should join the community lists. On 9 Jul 2013 14:44, "Luciano Resende" wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, ant elder wrote: > > > Loo

Re: Podling new committer votes

2013-07-09 Thread Luciano Resende
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, ant elder wrote: > Looking at the "Voting in a new committer" section at > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html i see that its been > updated since i last looked and now says the Incubator PMC should be > notified twice when a podling is voting in a new com

Podling new committer votes

2013-07-09 Thread ant elder
Looking at the "Voting in a new committer" section at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html i see that its been updated since i last looked and now says the Incubator PMC should be notified twice when a podling is voting in a new committer, once at the start of the vote and again with the re