ail archives.
>
As per http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2361
They were moved.
I see 3 emails including a test one I sent on the 22nd still in moderation
for their dev list.
Lucene.net has some cleaning up to do of their incubator resources.
For the record, I moved all of OpenWebBe
BIG!! congrats!
-Matthias
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> We have just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache
> OpenWebBeans as a project.
>
> I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have
> s
BIT congrats!!!
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> We have just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache
> OpenWebBeans as a project.
>
> I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have
> supported Op
Hi;
We have just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache
OpenWebBeans as a project.
I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have
supported OpenWebBeans during the incubation for their guidance, effort and
time.
I am very proud to be part of the Apache
for approval.
Best Regards;
--Gurkan
From: Gurkan Erdogdu
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, December 7, 2009 10:32:04 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP
Hi;
After over one years in the incubator with
+1
Congratulations!
Craig
On Dec 7, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Hi;
After over one years in the incubator with providing
three releases
OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel
that we are
ready to propose to the Incubator PMC
+1
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> After over one years in the incubator with providing three
> releases
> OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel that we
> are
> ready to propose to the Incubat
retaz
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
> 2009/12/7 Gurkan Erdogdu
>
>> Hi;
>>
>> After over one years in the incubator with providing three
>> releases
>> OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel that we
>> a
years in the incubator with providing three
> releases
> OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel that we
> are
> ready to propose to the Incubator PMC to graduate OpenWebBeans
> to a
> Top Level Project.
>
> See the following co
Recording my +1, again.
--kevan
On Dec 7, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> After over one years in the incubator with providing three
> releases
> OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel that we
> are
> ready
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> ...After over one years in the incubator with providing three
> releases
> OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel that we
> are
> ready to propose to the Incubator PM
+1 (again ;-) )
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> After over one years in the incubator with providing three
> releases
> OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel that we
> are
> ready to propose to
Hi;
After over one years in the incubator with providing three releases
OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel that we are
ready to propose to the Incubator PMC to graduate OpenWebBeans to a
Top Level Project.
See the following community
FYI,
The OpenWebBeans community has started a graduation vote on their dev-list.
--kevan
On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I would like to start a VOTE for graduating OWB as TLP.
>
> Please cast your VOTEs here. VOTE is open for 72 hours.
>
> [-
Hi;
The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is successful.
There are three +1 binding votes, not 0 or -1.
+1 Votes
-
* Kevan Miller
* Niall Pemberton
* Luciano Resende.
I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator "dist/" place.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Sep 30, 2009, at 4:16 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>>
>> For license issues, aforementioned libraries are included within
>> "samples/jms-sample-1.0.0-incubating-M3.war/WEB-INF/lib" folder.
>>
>> For source distribution, we include
On Sep 30, 2009, at 4:16 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Hi;
For license issues, aforementioned libraries are included within
"samples/jms-sample-1.0.0-incubating-M3.war/WEB-INF/lib" folder.
For source distribution, we included everything under the "svn/
trunk" that contains LICENSE, NOTICE, R
On Sep 29, 2009, at 11:38 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
This is why I complained about a podling release procedure.
We started a voting process to release M3 at September 1 and are
still not able to release. This maybe related with not enough IPMC
members in our community list to get their bi
.
Thanks;
--Gurkan
From: Luciano Resende
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:41:25 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)
The LICENSE.txt from the binary distribution mentions the following jars :
jsf-facelet-1.1.14.jar,
The LICENSE.txt from the binary distribution mentions the following jars :
jsf-facelet-1.1.14.jar, jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar, dom4j-1.6.1.jar,
javassist-3.8.0.GA.jar
But i can't find any of them in the binary distribution...
[apache-openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-binary]$ find . -name \
From: Mohammad Nour El-Din
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 1:54:55 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)
+1
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> +1
>
> Niall
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM,
+1
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> +1
>
> Niall
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
> wrote:
>> Hi;
>>
>>
>> This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3.
>>
>> OpenWebBeans is an Apache
+1
Niall
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
wrote:
> Hi;
>
>
> This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3.
>
> OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the
> JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform
:14:21 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)
Hi;
This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3.
OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the
JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform
which is defined as JSR-299.
OpenWebBeans
Hi;
This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3.
OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the
JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform
which is defined as JSR-299.
OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.
There is one
create distribution bundles and
> its name.
>
> Sure, I can remove "all" packages from the next release.
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
>
> ____
> From: sebb
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Friday,
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
> OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
> Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
> defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.
(This issue is not a release blocker.)
The
>>>IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes
>>>don't "carry over" (well mine never does) IMO.
Ok. I will create a second round VOTE on dev.
Thanks;
--Gurkan
From: Niall Pemberton
To: general@
ot advices our mentor while we were
>releasing
the our first milestone (M1) about how we create distribution bundles and its
name.
Sure, I can remove "all" packages from the next release.
Thanks;
--Gurkan
____
From: sebb
To: general@incubator.apac
On 17/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected
> Sebb's concerns.
>
> OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and
> Dependency Injection for the Java EE platf
On 17/09/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
> wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected
> Sebb's concerns.
> >
> > OpenWebBeans is an ASL-lice
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
wrote:
> Hi;
>
> This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected
> Sebb's concerns.
>
> OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and
> Dependency Injection for the
___
From: Niall Pemberton
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:25:55 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi Niall;
>
>>>>The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a v
Hi;
This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected
Sebb's concerns.
OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and
Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in Oc
s Niall for
jumping in.
-Matthias
>
> Niall
>
>> If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we
>> will try to be perfect :)
>>
>> Thanks;
>>
>> --Gurkan
>>
>>
>> ___
concerns in next M4 release that we
> will try to be perfect :)
not sure what exactly he said, but please file a JIRA ticket for it,
to not forget about it.
-Matthias
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
> From: Niall Pemberton
> To: general@in
ike to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we
>> will try to be perfect :)
>>
>> Thanks;
>>
>> --Gurkan
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Niall Pemberton
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>
but you need to allow time to see
if its possible.
Niall
> If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we
> will try to be perfect :)
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
> From: Niall Pemberton
> To: general@incu
OpenWebBeans M3
Hi Niall;
>>>The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
>>>when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
>>>etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
>>>vote.
>>&g
e.
I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release!
If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we
will try to be perfect :)
Thanks;
--Gurkan
From: Niall Pemberton
To: general@incubator.apache.org
he distribution,
> >>>so should not be mentioned in the NOTICE file.
> >>>(blocking)
>
> >>>Alswhat they apply.
> Last time I corrected NOTICE /LICENCE file that you commented at M2 release.
> It does not changed since M2 release.
Sorry, I
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
wrote:
> Hi;
>
> The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
> successful.
>
> There are three +1 binding
The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. A
Hi;
The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
successful.
There are three +1 binding
+1 Votes
-
* Kevan Miller (binding)
* Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
* Niall Pemberton (binding)
I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator "dist/"
tioned in the NOTICE file.
>>>(blocking)
>>>Alswhat they apply.
Last time I corrected NOTICE /LICENCE file that you commented at M2 release.
It does not changed since M2 release.
--Gurkan
2009/9/17 sebb
> On 14/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
>
On 14/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
>
> OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
> Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
> defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.
>
> The
+1
Niall
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
>
> OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
> Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
> defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator i
to graduate but it requires some more community!
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2009/9/14 Gurkan Erdogdu
> Hi;
>
>
> OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
> Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
> defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entere
Hi;
OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.
There are two *binding* +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@.. We still require to
Hi;
The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M2 is successful.
There are three +1 binding and one non-binding +0 votes, not -1.
+1 Votes
-
* Kevan Miller (binding)
* Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
* Ant Elder (binding)
+0 Votes
-
*Sebastian
On 02/06/2009, Brian Fox wrote:
> Agreed, there's no harm here, and they are tiny files. The deploy plugin
> adds hashes to all files that pass through it so it would need special logic
> to ignore these files.
See wish:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEPLOY-73
which was created: 23/Feb/08.
Agreed, there's no harm here, and they are tiny files. The deploy plugin
adds hashes to all files that pass through it so it would need special logic
to ignore these files.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:21 PM, sebb wrote:
> > The .asc.md
gt;
>>
>> From: sebb
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 10:21:09 PM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)
>>
>> +0
>>
>> Two files don't
t; Is the above votes enough to create release ? Or one more +1 is still
> necessary ?
>
> -- Gurkan
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: sebb
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 10:21:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE
sary ?
>
> -- Gurkan
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: sebb
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 10:21:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)
>
>
> +0
>
> Two files don't hav
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:21 PM, sebb wrote:
> The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins
> directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose.
These files are automatically produced by the interaction between
Maven and the Maven GPG plugin. The proper
, 2009 10:21:09 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)
+0
Two files don't have AL headers:
openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml
samples-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml
I'm not sure what these files are for.
The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should
+0
Two files don't have AL headers:
openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml
samples-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml
I'm not sure what these files are for.
The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins
directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful pur
Hi;
I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.
OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
Proposed released artifacts are:
Plugins repository
--
http
eed to mention http://facelets.dev.java.net/
> So, the remaining blocker issues is
>
> * Notice file content in the jars?
> * MANIFEST.mf content? (What will be the content of this?)
Instead of:
Implementation-Title: OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API
Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Ope
OK? I will correct this and create new release tag (rc3) in the
evening.
Thanks sebb;
-- Gurkan
2009/6/1 sebb
> I get the following for "svn info"
>
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2
> ...
> Last Cha
I get the following for "svn info"
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2
...
Last Changed Rev: 780477
...
So we agree.
==
The top-level NOTICE and LICENSE files are fine now.
The licenses/ directory should now be remove
Also this is the commit command
Revision
*780477*<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&sortby=log&sortdir=down&revision=780477>-
Directory
Listing<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/?sortby=log&sortdir=down&path
Sorry I do not understand what you mean. I am also not a svn expert.
I am looking at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/?pathrev=780504.
When I opened URL, it shows the
Directory revision: 780477 (of 780556)
Sticky revision : 780504
I
ral@incubator.apache.org
>
> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:25:14 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)
>
> >>>Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.
>
> Current Tag Revision is 780496
>
> Than
rkan Erdogdu
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:25:14 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)
>>>Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.
Current Tag Revision is 780496
Thanks;
__
>>>Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.
Current Tag Revision is 780496
Thanks;
From: sebb
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:06:00 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-
On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.
>
> Plugins repository
> --
>
> http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins
Hi;
I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs.
Plugins repository
--
http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
Distribution content
http
I will re-tag the releases and artifacts after correcting the errors.
--Gurkan
From: sebb
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu
> Thanks;
>
> --- Gurkan
>
>
> ____
> From: sebb
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
>
> On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release?
Thanks;
--- Gurkan
From: sebb
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu
On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
> Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
>
> Proposed released artifacts are:
>
> Plugins repository
> --
>
> h
Hi folks;
We require one more "binding" vote to publish release.
Thanks;
-- Gurkan
2009/5/26 Matthias Wessendorf
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
> wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > OpenWebBeans will be a
+1 (binding)
-Matthias
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
> Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
>
> Proposed released artifacts are:
>
Hi;
OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
Proposed released artifacts are:
Plugins repository
--
http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache
Hi;
Apache Incubator project OpenWebBeans has released first M1 version
successfully. You could obtain the distribution artifacts from the URL,
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/openwebbeans/.
Thanks to all for helping us in this first release process.
Gurkan Erdogdu
Hi;
The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M1 is successful.
There are three +1 binding votes, not 0 or -1.
+1 Votes
-
* Kevan Miller
* Matthias Wessendorf
* Luciano Resende.
I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator "dist/" plac
@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:53:20 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1
Looks good to me
+1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
>> The release vote on t
Looks good to me
+1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
>> The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *four*
>> +1
>> votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC member
On Feb 9, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in
*four* +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.
Just noting that the *four* +1 votes included two IPMC members
(Matthias Wessendorf and myself). We&#x
Congrats :-)
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
> Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
>
> Proposed released artifacts are:
>
> Plugins repository
> --
Hi;
OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
Proposed released artifacts are:
Plugins repository
--
http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M1/plugins/org/apache
need to edit anything. It is done.
>
> I was referring to the first step which was not done.
> Soon after that message someone did the 'svn mkdir ...'
> so your repository is ready at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/
>
> You should now co-ordinate o
svn mkdir ...'
so your repository is ready at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/
You should now co-ordinate on your dev mail list and decide
what directory structure and implement it with 'svn mkdir'.
Look around at other projects for examples.
-David
> Davi
that -- he mentioned this in an
> > earlier email.
>
> I only did the "svn authorization" part. The OpenWebBeans
> mentors should be able to handle the rest.
>
> i.e. I did the second part of:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository
>
> I
>
> >How will we going on?
>
> David Crossley already took care of that -- he mentioned this in an
> earlier email.
I only did the "svn authorization" part. The OpenWebBeans
mentors should be able to handle the rest.
i.e. I did the second part of:
http://incubator.apache.
On Nov 17, 2008, at 2:29 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Hi;
I looked at the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1775 for
creating the SVN, but it is commented with "Not an infra task. Needs
to be
done by someone on the incubator pmc."
How will we going on?
David Crossley already took
Hi;
I looked at the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1775 for
creating the SVN, but it is commented with "Not an infra task. Needs to be
done by someone on the incubator pmc."
How will we going on?
Thanks;
Gurkan Erdogdu
Thanks, it works.
Gurkan
From: David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 7:14:55 AM
Subject: OpenWebBeans svn authorization (Was: Update Incubator Status Page)
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
&
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
> I am the comitter of the recently incubator OpenWebBeans. I tried to do tasks
> that are explained in the http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html to
> update OpenWebBeans site (to put it into the site-author/projects/index.xml,
> and site-aut
vid Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> >> > Author: kevan
>> >> > Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008
>> >> > New Revision: 711682
>> >> >
>> >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682&view=rev
>> >
s of the project should do?
> >
> > Thanks;
> >
> > Gurkan
> >
> > 2008/11/6 David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >> > Author: kevan
> >> > Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008
> >> > New Revision: 711682
> >>
-
> From: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:07 AM
> Subject: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN
> To: Infrastructure Apache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Hi infra@ team,
>
> I am a mentor of the "OpenWebBeans&qu
ntors of the project should do?
>
> Thanks;
>
> Gurkan
>
> 2008/11/6 David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> > Author: kevan
>> > Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008
>> > New Revision: 711682
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.ap
ct should do?
>
> Thanks;
>
> Gurkan
>
> 2008/11/6 David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> > Author: kevan
>> > Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008
>> > New Revision: 711682
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682&view=
RL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Generate OpenWebBeans status page
> >
> > Added:
> > incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml (with
> props)
> > incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openw
at 4:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Subject: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN
To: Infrastructure Apache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi infra@ tea
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Subject: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN
To: Infrastructure Apache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi infra@ team,
I am a mentor of the "OpenWebB
it? (Or is Sam just busy w/ ACon ;))
>>
>> -M
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:06 PM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >> Author: kevan
>> >> Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008
>> >> New Revision: 7
2008
> >> New Revision: 711682
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >> Generate OpenWebBeans status page
> >>
> >> Added:
> >> incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwe
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
