On Sunday 19 March 2006 20:46, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:41:04AM +, James Strachan wrote:
> > (i) don't use the incubator code, but fork it elsewhere (say to
> > codehaus) and make releases there if Geronimo needs bug fixes
> > (ii) Geronimo use incubator release candidate
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:41:04AM +, James Strachan wrote:
> BTW I CC'd the Geronimo PMC as this is an interesting dilema for the
> Geronimo folks too
I'm not so happy with crossposting between public/private lists (private lists
should be unused if possible) so I dropped that again...thi
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, James Strachan wrote:
BTW we are currently calling all the artifacts incubator-activemq-*,
the jars are all called incubator-activemq*.jar, we include
disclaimers in the distro highlighting the incubator status and also
include these inside the manife
my 2 cents.
(i) don't use the incubator code, but fork it elsewhere (say to
codehaus) and make releases there if Geronimo needs bug fixes
-1
(ii) Geronimo use incubator release candidate releases
+1
(iii) ActiveMQ performs actual releases that Geronimo can depend on
and use but put sufficient
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, James Strachan wrote:
BTW we are currently calling all the artifacts incubator-activemq-*,
the jars are all called incubator-activemq*.jar, we include
disclaimers in the distro highlighting the incubator status and also
include these inside the manifests of the jars. So it
BTW I CC'd the Geronimo PMC as this is an interesting dilema for the
Geronimo folks too
On 3/17/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:10:50PM +, James Strachan wrote:
> > On 3/16/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So we could include the in
On Saturday 18 March 2006 01:36, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I am quite new at Apache, but from my understanding, the incubation
> process as nothing to do with the quality of the releases the
> incubated project produces. It has mainly to do with the ASF
> endorsing the project (though I do not ha
Leo Simons wrote:
The policy is (supposed to be) a codification of that general rule. Using
keywords
such as "alpha", "beta", "milestone", "release candidate" and the like is
another
way that we tend to use to accomplish the same thing -- get people to test drive
our stuff but only deploy in
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:10:50PM +, James Strachan wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So we could include the incubating ActiveMQ code inside an actual production
> Geronimo release - provided the ActiveMQ jars keep (their current name) of
> incubator-activemq.
