On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Sean Hamblett wrote:
> Isn't Geronimo something you yell when you jump out of a
> plane?
As I said,
> > Geronimo isn't too bad, though it may be tricky to get the boss to bet
> > the farm on it.
Though I've never jumped out of a plane before, so I really
woul
> A J2EE container is a little different from an Avalon container. Avalon
> is a generic service/component framework. The core Geronimo container
> is an optimised J2EE container developed from a great deal of
> experience and use of JBoss, OpenEJB & mx4j. Its particularly geared
> towards EJB
"Noel J. Bergman" wrote:
> > What is really interesting about the Geronimo name, which I like BTW, is
> that
> > everyone remembers it. Everyone comments on it one way or another. Its a
> good
> > name. I say we stick with it.
>
> There are plenty of other names. JEEP, JPAE (Java Platform Apach
me people were wary of running their sites on 'a
patchy server' as well.
Cheers,
--
N. Alex Rupp ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Mulder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Na
On the naming front, IMHO the best we came up with for the same
sort of project back in the days of Olliance was "Jarbanzo", but we
eventually settled on something lame like "Enterprise App Server". I also
kicked around "Orbital" (as in, it runs circles around XxxSphere... :)
Geronimo
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 05:55 pm, Tim Urberg wrote:
A J2EE container is a little different from an Avalon container.
Avalon
is a generic service/component framework. The core Geronimo container
is an optimised J2EE container developed from a great deal of
experience and use of JBoss, Op
> What is really interesting about the Geronimo name, which I like BTW, is
that
> everyone remembers it. Everyone comments on it one way or another. Its a
good
> name. I say we stick with it.
There are plenty of other names. JEEP, JPAE (Java Platform Apache Edition),
or whatever. There is a grea
Isn't Geronimo something you yell when you jump out of a
plane?
Sean
Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the naming front, IMHO the best we came up with for
the same
sort of project back in the days of Olliance was
"Jarbanzo", but we
eventually settled on something lame like "Enterp
Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> To be certified Geronimo needs to fully support JMX. So the current
> plan is to follow the Tomcat 5 & JBoss ideas to use MBeans to register
> & wire the services together. Whatever component model or libraries a
> particular service wishes to u
Maybe a quicker answer to this thread is - the core Geronimo container
is an EJB / MDB container which supports pluggable services via JMX.
Thats quite different to the scope of Avalon.
(Can you tell I've given up caffeine recently - my brains still a bit
fuzzy today :)
On Wednesday, August 6
sign that logo : )
I'm sure once upon a time people were wary of running their sites on 'a
patchy server' as well.
Cheers,
--
N. Alex Rupp ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Mulder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: W
What is really interesting about the Geronimo name, which I like BTW, is that
everyone remembers it. Everyone comments on it one way or another. Its a good
name. I say we stick with it.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Sean Hamblett wrote:
> > Isn't Geronimo something you yell when you j
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 04:10 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:21 PM
On the project front, am I correct that the goal is to integrate
other projects wherever possible and only build
> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:21 PM
>
> On the project front, am I correct that the goal is to integrate
> other projects wherever possible and only build when strictly necessary?
> If there is going to be
> Isn't Geronimo something you yell when you jump out of a
> plane?
By which token Banzai! would also be politically incorrect.. ;-)
d.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
> I've seen a few people say, "I don't like [the name].",
> but I've seen far more say nothing at all.
Water under the bridge for now. :-)
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 05:18 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote:
Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 04:34 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote:
Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
To be certified Geronimo needs to fully support JMX. So the current
plan is to
nal Message -
From: "Aaron Mulder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Names & Projects
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Sean Hamblett wrote:
> > Isn't Geronimo something you yell when you jump out of a
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Names & Projects
Isn't Geronimo something you yell when you jump out of a
plane?
Sean
Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On the naming front, IMHO the best we came up with for
>the same
> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:21 PM
>
> On the project front, am I correct that the goal is to integrate
> other projects wherever possible and only build when strictly
> necessary? If there is going to be b
Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 04:34 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote:
>
> > Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> To be certified Geronimo needs to fully support JMX. So the current
> >> plan is to follow the Tomcat 5 & JBoss ideas to use
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 04:34 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote:
Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
To be certified Geronimo needs to fully support JMX. So the current
plan is to follow the Tomcat 5 & JBoss ideas to use MBeans to register
& wire the services together. Whatever component mo
22 matches
Mail list logo
