Don Brown wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > To be clear, are you indicating that the copyright notice is simply
> > entirely false, the notice was erroneously placed, and that the
> > named entity has no copyright on the code?
> That is my understanding, yes. Simply a misconfiguration of IDEA.
That is my understanding, yes. Simply a misconfiguration of IDEA.
Don
On 4/5/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Don,
>
> To be clear, are you indicating that the copyright notice is simply
> entirely
> false, the notice was erroneously placed, and that the named entity has no
> c
Don,
To be clear, are you indicating that the copyright notice is simply entirely
false, the notice was erroneously placed, and that the named entity has no
copyright on the code?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA
On 4/5/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the WebWork2 podling, we have several files that contain a copyright
> header naming the file as belonging to the ePlus corporation. Turns out,
> this copyright was mistakenly applied due a developer's mistaken IDEA
> configuration, which was se
In the WebWork2 podling, we have several files that contain a copyright
header naming the file as belonging to the ePlus corporation. Turns out,
this copyright was mistakenly applied due a developer's mistaken IDEA
configuration, which was set to add that copyright to every new file. That
develop
