On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Anubhav Saini
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I would like to work on Lucene4c project under ASF flagship, please
> let me know if I can help in anyway. Thanks.
The Lucene4c project was retired from the Incubator several years ago, before
it made a releas
Hi there,
I would like to work on Lucene4c project under ASF flagship, please
let me know if I can help in anyway. Thanks.
--
Best of Regards
Anubhav Saini
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Hello Vinay,
> I am interested in working on the Lucene4c project. Please let me know
> how I can get started.
we had another inquiry about that in November [1].
I suggest you contact that person, maybe the two of
you can find a few more interested people and get
the project going again.
Hi
I am interested in working on the Lucene4c project. Please let me know
how I can get started.
Regards
Vinay
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do you have in mind with lucene4c? That project was closed
down a while ago. There is also the goal of Lucy http://
lucene.apache.org/lucy/ that hasn't materialized yet either.
Erik
On Sep 26, 2007, at 9:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All!
We're interested
Hi All!
We're interested to follow the work on "Lucene4C" project at
http://incubator.apache.org/lucene4c/
What are the requirements ?
Best Regards
-
INEODEV Team
S.A.R.L INEODEV
9, rue Med Sekir,
H.Dey, Alger, Algérie
Mobile: +21
Hi Tim,
It's great that you're interested in Apache, and there are lots of
ways you can participate.
Sadly, the lucene4c project never quite got off the ground, and was
closed for lack of activity in October 2006. You can find this from
their incubator status
Hi,
I've just finished school, and I'd like to get involved (somehow)
with the ASF and the Lucene4c in particular. I have some experience
with C, but have a lot to learn, and I'm wondering if there is anyway
that I could get involved with this project.
Anyway, what would
cess of
shutting down lucene4c I put a "hey, ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you
want to get this project started again" notice on the project's web
site, mainly because I was planning on turning off the lucene4c
mailing lists because at this point all they do is generate moderation
requests
n the discussion, look at the project's issue tracker for open issues
and submit patches to them, and so on. Typically each project has
directions on how to get involved.
Yoav
On 10/27/06, Steven Parkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lucene4c recently went dormant. You might be interest
lucene4c recently went dormant. You might be interested in Lucy:
http://lucene.apache.org/lucy/
-Original Message-
From: sachin sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 1:08 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Request to join in development of lucene4c
Hi All,
I also want to join the development team of lucene4c. Please tell me the
way to get the same.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Sachin Sharma
-
Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out.
On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since there hasn't been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some
time, I'd like to officially mark it as dormant so I don't have to
keep writing board reports that just say "there has been no progress
in the
+1
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
-Yonik
On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since there hasn't been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some
time, I'd like to officially mark it as dormant so I don't have to
keep writing board reports that just say "there has been no pro
On 10/10/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 9, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Since there hasn't been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some
> time, I'd like to officially mark it as dormant so I don't have to
> keep writing board re
On Oct 9, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Since there hasn't been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some
time, I'd like to officially mark it as dormant so I don't have to
keep writing board reports that just say "there has been no progress
in the last 3 mont
TED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Yoav
Shapira
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 5:07 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark lucene4c as dormant
Hi,
Please don't replace the link yet. If you wish to add a link to
Lucene.Net
in addition to the existing l
[X] +1 - Mark Lucene4c as dormant.
[ ] 0 - I have no opinion.
[ ] -1 - No, please keep it! [include reason]
Otis
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yoav
Shapira
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 5:07 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark lucene4c as dormant
Hi,
Please don't replace the link yet. If you wish to add a link to Lucene.Net
in addition to the existing lucene4c one, have a blast (though note I'm not
in
Hi,
Please don't replace the link yet. If you wish to add a link to
Lucene.Net in addition to the existing lucene4c one, have a blast
(though note I'm not in the lucene PMC). Dormancy doesn't quite mean
death yet: we will probably mark it as dormant, put up a notice,
redirect mai
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And may I suggest that on the Lucene main page, here
http://lucene.apache.org/, we replace the link to Lucene4C to link to
Lucene.Net, which is http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/
I be happy to do this myself if someone will tell me where to find the page
to http://lucene.apache.org/ -- of
+1
Sorry to see Lucene4c go dormant, but here's to the success of Lucy!
Erik
On Oct 9, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Since there hasn't been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some
time, I'd like to officially mark it as dormant so I don't have t
On 10/9/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ X ] +1 - Mark Lucene4c as dormant.
> [ ] 0 - I have no opinion.
> [ ] -1 - No, please keep it! [include reason]
Will people have a post-ApacheCon tod
Hi,
On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ X ] +1 - Mark Lucene4c as dormant.
[ ] 0 - I have no opinion.
[ ] -1 - No, please keep it! [include reason]
Will people have a post-ApacheCon todo / done list as well? I saw
this item on your preconference todo list ;)
On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since there hasn't been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some
time, I'd like to officially mark it as dormant so I don't have to
keep writing board reports that just say "there has been no progress
in the
Since there hasn't been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some
time, I'd like to officially mark it as dormant so I don't have to
keep writing board reports that just say "there has been no progress
in the last 3 months".
So, cast your votes now:
[ ] +1 -
Thanks to Justin Erenkrantz's help getting us set up with Subversion,
Lucene4c has been imported into the ASF incubator repository. Get it
while it's hot at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene4c/trunk/
Commit mails are currently going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (although
t
David Crossley wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
2) Add the status page and update website:
http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html#Updating+the+site
As a mentor, Erik, you should be able to add it. If someone can clarify
the acceptance then i will add it.
Okay, i have d
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >2) Add the status page and update website:
> >http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html#Updating+the+site
> >As a mentor, Erik, you should be able to add it. If someone can clarify
> >the acceptance then i will add it.
Okay, i have done that
David Crossley wrote:
Oh, i hate to see stuff go unanswered - i don't know the procedure either
but will try my best. With the outcome of this we should create a
very simple Guidelines document to show the steps.
Erik Hatcher wrote:
If there are things that I can do to give Garrett karma or update
ther, but ping?
Don't apologise. Sorry that you need to ping. Keep asking, because
people are busy.
--David
> >Should I be waiting around for someone to commit the initial status
> >web page for Lucene4c, or should I be bugging the infrastructure guys
> >to extend me th
round for someone to commit the initial status
web page for Lucene4c, or should I be bugging the infrastructure guys
to extend me the appropriate karma to do it myself, or what? I'd
really like to avoid getting tied down on this sort of thing and get
on with actually moving the project in
other, but ping?
Should I be waiting around for someone to commit the initial status web
page for Lucene4c, or should I be bugging the infrastructure guys to
extend me the appropriate karma to do it myself, or what? I'd really
like to avoid getting tied down on this sort of thing and get on w
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
+
+
+
+Lucene4c Incubation Status
+http://purl.org/DC/elements/1.0/"; rel="schema.DC">
+
+
+
+Lucene4c Project Incubation Status
+This page tracks the project status, incubator-wise. For more
+general project stat
On Feb 21, 2005, at 5:46 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
The Lucene PMC has unanimously voted to accept the Lucene4c codebase.
Let's bring it into incubation!
What's next?
I figure this probably fell off most people's radar over the weekend,
but just so there's
Erik Hatcher wrote:
The Lucene PMC has unanimously voted to accept the Lucene4c codebase.
Let's bring it into incubation!
What's next?
I figure this probably fell off most people's radar over the weekend,
but just so there's something sitting in the top of the inbox, ping?
The Lucene PMC has unanimously voted to accept the Lucene4c codebase.
Let's bring it into incubation!
What's next?
Erik
On Feb 17, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 17, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
It seems that the best course of action is for the Luc
On Feb 17, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
It seems that the best course of action is for the Lucene PMC to vote
whether they want to accept the project for incubation (which they are
currently doing), then bring the project into the incubator and try to
build up a more sustainable comm
'developer community' of lucene4c is currently just me, although
others have expressed interest. The user community is currently
nonexistant because the code has yet to reach a point where it's really
useful to an end-user, although it's getting there.
It seems that the best c
Erik Hatcher wrote:
> > On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only
>>> to do the required IP checklist.
> I'm not sure what is meant by "register the IP stuff here".
I'm in an airplane, and can't check the URL, but
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Garrett,
You're right that all new code bases should come through the Incubator.
However, the appropriate PMC to vote on whether it should be accepted
into the incubator is the sponsoring PMC, which in this case appears to
be the Lucene PMC. (The Incubator PMC does sponsor som
hat is the
> consensus. It was created entirely by Garrett and he's agreed to
> donate it, so the IP should be pretty clear cut.
>
> Erik
>
>
> >
> > I hope I'm just misunderstanding, but this appears to be a proposal
> > to create a new project a
to Lucene's repository if that is the
consensus. It was created entirely by Garrett and he's agreed to
donate it, so the IP should be pretty clear cut.
Erik
I hope I'm just misunderstanding, but this appears to be a proposal to
create a new project at the ASF called &
Garrett Rooney wrote:
I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
+1. I would love to see Lucene4c take off, and making it part of Lucene
would be a great boost to it.
-Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
ucene project?
The Lucene PMC could bring the codebase into their project and
register the IP stuff here w/ the incubator.
I hope I'm just misunderstanding, but this appears to be a proposal
to create a new project at the ASF called "Lucene4c"
The proposal was to create Lucene4c as a
ebase into their project and register the
IP stuff here w/ the incubator.
I hope I'm just misunderstanding, but this appears to be a proposal to
create a new project at the ASF called "Lucene4c"
The proposal was to create Lucene4c as a a subproject of the Lucene TLP.
We weren'
t and register the
IP stuff here w/ the incubator.
I hope I'm just misunderstanding, but this appears to be a proposal to
create a new project at the ASF called "Lucene4c"
geir
On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requi
directly to the Lucene project and bypass incubation?
Erik
On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
Lucene4c is a port of the Lucene search engine from Java to C, using
the Apache Portable Runtime library for portability.
I'd love to see this happen, and bringing it into the Lucene Project
proper seems to make sense, from a Lucene outsider.
-Brian
On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
Lucene4c is a port of the Lucene search engine fr
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
incubation? Or because it was a single developer, could he contribute
it directly to the Lucene project and bypass incubation?
It's currently about 6500 lines of C code. I'm not sure what the cutoff
point is (or
I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
incubation? Or because it was a single developer, could he contribute
it directly to the Lucene project and bypass incubation?
Erik
On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I'd like to propose the Lucene4c pr
I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
Lucene4c is a port of the Lucene search engine from Java to C, using the
Apache Portable Runtime library for portability. The project is far
from complete, and code to date is primarily concerned with reading an
existing Lucene
54 matches
Mail list logo
