On 02.02.2013 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 18:06:11 +0100:
>> On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
>>> whimsy doesn
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 18:06:11 +0100:
> On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
> >> I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
> > whimsy doesn't have the public-arch tree locally.
>
> Th
On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
>> I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
> whimsy doesn't have the public-arch tree locally.
Thanks for reminding me again ... silly me.
>> change the incubator.a.o
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
> On 01.02.2013 18:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
> >> I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
> >> doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and
On 01.02.2013 18:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
>> I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
>> doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server.
> The only supported way to get content to the web
On 01.02.2013 20:48, sebb wrote:
> On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
>>> On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Ja
On 1 February 2013 19:48, sebb wrote:
> On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
>>> On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote on T
On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
>> On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
>> I g
On 1 February 2013 17:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
>> I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
>> doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server.
>
> The only supported way to get content to
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
> I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
> doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server.
The only supported way to get content to the web servers is to commit it
to svn and have svnpub
On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
> On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
> I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting t
On 31.01.2013 11:02, sebb wrote:
> On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
>> preview at
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
>>
>> By "embedded" I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the Inc
On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
probably file an INFR
On 31.01.2013 14:13, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 31.01.2013 11:02, sebb wrote:
>> On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
>>> preview at
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
>>>
>>> By "emb
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
>>> I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
>>> probably file an INFRA ticket). Infra are also in the best position to
>>>
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
>> I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
>> probably file an INFRA ticket). Infra are also in the best position to
>> know if we can have the page regenerated more
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
> I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
> probably file an INFRA ticket). Infra are also in the best position to
> know if we can have the page regenerated more often, e.g., once an hour.
The first issue I s
On 31.01.2013 15:12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 31.01.2013 10:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
pre
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 31.01.2013 10:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
>>> preview at
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~brane/fa
On 31.01.2013 10:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
>> preview at
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
>>
>> By "embedded" I mean, integrated in
FWIW, I am definitively +1 to have it included in the incubator site
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> There is now an embedded version of
On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej wrote:
> There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
> preview at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
>
> By "embedded" I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the Incubator site.
> The page is updated every
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
> preview at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
>
> By "embedded" I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the Incubator site.
> The page is updated
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By "embedded" I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the Incubator site.
The page is updated every 4 hours.
-- Brane
---
Branko Čibej wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote:
> >> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >>> David Crossley wrote:
>
> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
> podling metadata is not reliable. That
On 29.01.2013 17:23, sebb wrote:
> On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
needed to deal with over the years. In
On 1/29/13 12:53 AM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>
> I have a current example. Flex and Wink haven't updated their
> podlings.xml entries to
> status="graduated"
> , therefore certain infra scripts still consider them podlings rather
> than PMCs.
My bad. I somehow missed that in the list of
On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
>>> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
>>> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
>>> podling meta
On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
>> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
>> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
>> podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we
>> ne
David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
> podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we
> need to get podling developers interested with.
>
Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 28.01.2013 08:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:22:42 +0100:
> >> On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >>> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
> On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
> >
thanks a lot Branko,
much more than appreciated!!!
all the best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 28.01.2013 10:01, Simone Tri
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 28.01.2013 10:01, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Branko!
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> Ah, could it be then that content/projects/onami.xml is just wrong and
>>> needs to be updated?
>> yes, we published the
On 28.01.2013 10:01, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Branko!
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Ah, could it be then that content/projects/onami.xml is just wrong and
>> needs to be updated?
> yes, we published the status page before we got the MLs addresses and
> noticed they
Hi Branko!
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Ah, could it be then that content/projects/onami.xml is just wrong and
> needs to be updated?
yes, we published the status page before we got the MLs addresses and
noticed they are in the new pattern :P could one of the mentor ple
On 28.01.2013 08:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:22:42 +0100:
>> On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Brane, are you currently using t
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:22:42 +0100:
> On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
> >> On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
> >>> Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
> >>>
On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
>> On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
>>> need to add a field to it we can.
>> Nope, I'm currently walking the
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
> On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
> > need to add a field to it we can.
>
> Nope, I'm currently walking the incubator archive tree. The clutch
> metada
On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
> need to add a field to it we can.
Nope, I'm currently walking the incubator archive tree. The clutch
metadata is in general good enough, since if clutch can generate
target/curre
Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
need to add a field to it we can.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 26.01.2013 00:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 18:40:18 +0100:
>>> On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel
On 26.01.2013 00:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 18:40:18 +0100:
>> On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 18:40:18 +0100:
> On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
> >> I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
> >> list archives, not just general@, for vote threads
On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
>> I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
>> list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
> Do you also parse the d...@helix.incubator.apache.o
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
> I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
> list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
Do you also parse the d...@helix.incubator.apache.org archives, which are in
~apmail/public-arch/h
that actually gets delivered to subscribers by the list server.
>
Counterexample:
Message-ID: <20130124161931.GE3874@lp-shahaf.local>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:19:31 +0200
From: Daniel Shahaf
To: Branko Čibej
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Inc
On 25.01.2013 16:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
>> contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
> I'll bet that Ryan isn't subscribed to general@incuba
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
> contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
I'll bet that Ryan isn't subscribed to general@incubator and that his message
wasn't moderated through
I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
general@. This solved t
Great job, Brane!
On 1/24/13 3:50 AM, "Joachim Dreimann"
wrote:
>Good work Brane. Just one feature suggestion: Could you display the
>relative time (ie '3 days ago') in the table, and the absolute time in
>tooltips?
>That would make it much easier to read I reckon.
>
>Cheers,
>Joe
>
>
>On 24 Jan
On 24.01.2013 22:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
> I've noticed before that our archives seem to be incomplete, and
> indeed it appears that the mbox files contain only messages To: a
> list, everything that actually gets delivered to subscribers by the
> list server.
I meant to say, /not/ everything that
On 24.01.2013 17:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
>> On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
>>> Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
>>> looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
>>>
On 24/01/13 16:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't take cc
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
> On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
> > Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
> > looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
> > doesn't take cc's as being on the list or som
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
> We all seem to want a bit of feature creep. I would probably include a
> last update time for the page.
Guys, you're committers, the code is in Subversion, go wild :)
> Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
> looks like the
We all seem to want a bit of feature creep. I would probably include a
last update time for the page.
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't take cc's as being on the list or something
Good work Brane. Just one feature suggestion: Could you display the
relative time (ie '3 days ago') in the table, and the absolute time in
tooltips?
That would make it much easier to read I reckon.
Cheers,
Joe
On 24 January 2013 04:05, Branko Čibej wrote:
> A while ago I proposed we should hav
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>...the current results are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator-votes.html
>
> That page (should) get updated every 4 hours...
Cool - it might make sense to integrate with https://whimsy.apache.org/
-Bertrand
-
On 24.01.2013 06:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:05:42 +0100:
>> There are currently no links to the actual vote threads. Also I'm having
>> a bit of trouble with the feed from mod_mbox, as it's quite short-term
>> and doesn't seem to be at all complete; tha
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:05:42 +0100:
> There are currently no links to the actual vote threads. Also I'm having
> a bit of trouble with the feed from mod_mbox, as it's quite short-term
> and doesn't seem to be at all complete; that's why I switched to using
> the current month
Thats cool. I have something like that in mind before a couple of
days. Now its here. Its like Christmas. Thank you.
Our tool "Marvin" sens out mails for reports already; maybe it can be
used for reminders to vote too. If you find the code of Marvin, pls
let me know. I wanted to change the recipien
A while ago I proposed we should have a status page showing current
pending votes.
To this end I've begun writing a simple script that parses the
general@incubator Atom feed from Markmail and creates a static web page
with information gleaned from there (it keeps longer-term data in a
SQLite datab
62 matches
Mail list logo
