Re: Zipkin incubator status needs updating

Hi Christopher, Yes, Zipkin has retired from incubator, I will make sure the relevant pages are updated, thank you for bringing this up. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:59 PM Christopher wrote: > I noticed a broken Jenkins job for Zipkin on builds.apache.org > But, when

Zipkin incubator status needs updating

I noticed a broken Jenkins job for Zipkin on builds.apache.org But, when I checked into it further, I saw: https://github.com/apache/zipkin redirects outside of Apache. https://zipkin.apache.org doesn't exist According to https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/zipkin , I think it is retired, but t

[GitHub] [incubator] justinmclean merged pull request #29: Adjust Incubator status URL

justinmclean merged pull request #29: Adjust Incubator status URL URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/29 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

[GitHub] [incubator] gianm opened a new pull request #29: Adjust Incubator status URL

gianm opened a new pull request #29: Adjust Incubator status URL URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/29 - Fix path to include 'projects' rather than 'project' - Changed http to https (http works, but IMO preferring https when available

Re: Incubator status report - Crail

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:36 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > Crail is a new podling, and I am one of its mentors. It was not listed in > the template for this month’s report[1] (we are looking into why) so we > wrote it in. There is no shepherd assigned. > > I see why. Nothing to worry about, just a timi

Incubator status report - Crail

Crail is a new podling, and I am one of its mentors. It was not listed in the template for this month’s report[1] (we are looking into why) so we wrote it in. There is no shepherd assigned. Julian [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2017

Re: Incubator status page for Guacamole reverted (somehow?)

The issue's been resolved. Recent permission changes caused the prior checkout of the SVN dir to not be writable. Gav was able to fix it. On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 2:58 PM John D. Ament wrote: > I'll follow up with infra, I think I see what the issue is. > > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 2:30 PM Mik

Re: Incubator status page for Guacamole reverted (somehow?)

I'll follow up with infra, I think I see what the issue is. On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 2:30 PM Mike Jumper wrote: > Hello all, > > I recently updated the Guacamole podling status page [1] to reflect its > graduation: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1815410 > > The following

Incubator status page for Guacamole reverted (somehow?)

Hello all, I recently updated the Guacamole podling status page [1] to reflect its graduation: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1815410 The following morning, I verified that the changes deployed automatically, and all was well. Later that day, however, the changes mysteriousl

Re: Question regarding incubator status page

I also got confused by this part of the podling status page. Perhaps we can fix this by changing the wording: >> > members> >> If the project website and code repository are not yet set up, use the >> following table: I’m not sure about the utility of verifying the current state of the podling.

Re: Question regarding incubator status page

The expectation is that all podlings site should have "Team" page to list all PPMCs and committers. But I understand the confusion, because I do not see it mention in podling site guide [1] nor any top level guide Also, the statement kind of hint that you no longer need to update the table once y

Question regarding incubator status page

All, The Juneau podling pointed this line on the status page template to me, which at least to me doesn't make sense: If the project website and code repository are not yet setup, use the following table: So are we not supposed to include the table if the website is up? Do we expect podlings (a

Re: Incubator Status

Which project are you speaking about? This is the general list at which mich projects are discussed On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Michael Kelleher wrote: > Is there a plan for promoting this project to top level status?  If so, is > there a projected timeline? > > I would like to use this for

Re: Incubator Status

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Michael Kelleher wrote: > Is there a plan for promoting this project to top level status?  If so, is > there a projected timeline? Unless you specify which project you aim to graduate, I can only assume it is the incubator itself, which is already top level. > Do

Incubator Status

Is there a plan for promoting this project to top level status? If so, is there a projected timeline? I would like to use this for our client, but will be potentially difficult with this project not being "officially" release. Does anyone have suggestions for how to handle a conversation abo

Re: November 2010 Incubator Status Report

bo...@apache.org >> Sent: Thu, December 2, 2010 10:16:02 AM >> Subject: Re: November 2010 Incubator Status Report >> >> Hi all... >> >>    First of all sorry for spreading this on both general@  and board@ >> cause I didn't know in advance to which ML I shoul

Re: November 2010 Incubator Status Report

and I will adjust your karma accordingly. - Original Message > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: bo...@apache.org > Sent: Thu, December 2, 2010 10:16:02 AM > Subject: Re: November 2010 Incubator Status Report > > Hi all... >

Re: November 2010 Incubator Status Report

Hi all... First of all sorry for spreading this on both general@ and board@ cause I didn't know in advance to which ML I should send this e-mail. I was so excited when I saw my name nominated to be an IPMC member not the for the IPMC thing itself but for what it indicates that I have more trust

Re: November 2010 Incubator Status Report - Updated

On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 13:15 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Missing reports: Droids I just added it. Very sorry for the delay. salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler codeBusters S.L. - web based systems http://www.codebusters.es/ - To u

RE: November 2010 Incubator Status Report - Update 2

Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: >>  - Stonehenge appears to have been dead since July, when it made a >>milestone release, and is discussing being archived.  There >>appears to be disappointment over the perceived disappearance >>of Microsoft and WSO2. > Just for the

Re: November 2010 Incubator Status Report - Update 2

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Missing reports: Droids, HISE, Stonehenge > >  - Stonehenge appears to have been dead since July, when it made a > milestone release, and is discussing being archived.  There appears to be > disappointment over the perceived disappearance

November 2010 Incubator Status Report - Update 2

The update is Droids report. --- The updates are the addition of Deltacloud, VCL and Wookie reports. --- There are no issues for the Board. New PMC Members: Hadrian Zbarcea, Isabel Drost, Siegfried Goeschi,

November 2010 Incubator Status Report - Updated

The updates are the addition of Deltacloud, VCL and Wookie reports. --- There are no issues for the Board. New PMC Members: Hadrian Zbarcea, Isabel Drost, Siegfried Goeschi, Mohammad Nour El-Din (pending his acceptance). Henning Schmiedehausen has lef

November 2010 Incubator Status Report

--- There are no issues for the Board. New PMC Members: Hadrian Zbarcea, Isabel Drost, Siegfried Goeschi, Mohammad Nour El-Din (pending his acceptance). Henning Schmiedehausen has left the PMC. Infrastructure has proposed that the Incubator switch ove

Re: OpenWebBeans svn authorization (Was: Update Incubator Status Page)

Thanks, it works. Gurkan From: David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 7:14:55 AM Subject: OpenWebBeans svn authorization (Was: Update Incubator Status Page) Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > &

OpenWebBeans svn authorization (Was: Update Incubator Status Page)

Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > > I am the comitter of the recently incubator OpenWebBeans. I tried to do tasks > that are explained in the http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html to > update OpenWebBeans site (to put it into the site-author/projects/index.xml, > and site-author/stylesheets/pro

Update Incubator Status Page

Hi; I am the comitter of the recently incubator OpenWebBeans. I tried to do tasks that are explained in the http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html to update OpenWebBeans site (to put it into the site-author/projects/index.xml, and site-author/stylesheets/project.xml, also some updates

January 2008 incubator status report for Sanselan

2008-January Sanselan Incubator status report Sanselan has been in incubation since September 2007. Sanselan is a pure-java image library for reading and writing a variety of image formats. The community is still small, with a few more members now compared to the beginning. The code base has

2007-November Sanselan Incubator status report

2007-November Sanselan Incubator status report The autoexport from confluence to our site has been set up (see http://incubator.apache.org/sanselan/) so documenation can be added soon. We are looking for images (with no copyright restrictions) that can be used for unit testing. Existing

2007-November JSPWiki Incubator status report

2007-November JSPWiki Incubator status report JSPWiki infrastructure has been moved over to Apache: the issue trackers and the mailing lists are now fully operational. We've also started the process of getting ICLAs and Software Grants from all the previous contributors who still

"Collaborative Development" items on Incubator status pages (was Re: [DISCUSS] incubator voting process)

Craig L Russell wrote: > On Nov 10, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > >> On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> 6. Cayenne: >>> Mentors:Jean Anderson, Brian McAllister, Bill Dudney >>> Started:March 2006 >>> Incomplete: Nothing >>>

[Attention] Incubator Status Reporters

... don't forget to update your respective https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/{proj}.xml files and keep them in sync with 'reported' status ;-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: incubator status page

Hi All, Noel (or anyone else) do you have any insight into a Confluence install? I've included a bit of history below for review. The Cayenne community has an extensive set of docs in Confluence and we would really like to continue to use Confluence going forward. Is that possible on Apac

Re: incubator status page

[Fwded from [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 3/9/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Wiki - we should follow up with Geronimo and Infrastructure > regarding Confluence install @apache (Geronimo pushed for Confluence > install, but AFAIK there was no resolution yet). Switching to > MoinMoin i

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

Rodney, I don't know of any specific requirement regarding proof of authorization. If you feel that you have the authorization, sign the grant, and post a notice to your list that you have done so. --- Noel - To unsubsc

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > Again, IANAL, but in lieu of an informed declaration to the contrary, > > > I suggest that we would spend more time discussing it than it takes > > > to have each person FAX in two documents. >

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Again, IANAL, but in lieu of an informed declaration to the contrary, > > I suggest that we would spend more time discussing it than it takes > > to have each person FAX in two documents. > There is language in the Axion license to the effect of

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Again, IANAL, but in lieu of an informed declaration to the contrary, I > suggest that we would spend more time discussing it than it takes to have > each person FAX in two documents. Unless those folks have disappeared from the project. We can try to

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Make sure that all of the contributors to the code submit the appropriate > > signed documents (http://www.apache.org/licenses/). I know that at least > > some have not yet done so. There should be information in the STATUS file. > As noted in

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

Ping? On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > Make sure that all of the contributors to the code submit the appropriate > > signed documents (http://www.apache.org/licenses/). I know that at least > > some have not yet done so. There shoul

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Make sure that all of the contributors to the code submit the appropriate > signed documents (http://www.apache.org/licenses/). I know that at least > some have not yet done so. There should be information in the STATUS file. > > For example, when th

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

Morgan Delagrange wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > What do you see > > as the holdups? > Roy said we need to finish "filling-out the > documentation of the IP transfer", but I'm not > familiar what that documentation is. Where do > I sign? Make sure that all of the contributors to the code s

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

--- "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By the next report, we expect to have completed > the > > transfer from our license to the ASF license. > > How long do you expect it to take to complete > incubation? I don't have an expectation at this point; I haven't seen enough projects

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

> By the next report, we expect to have completed the > transfer from our license to the ASF license. How long do you expect it to take to complete incubation? What do you see as the holdups? --- Noel - To unsubscribe,

Incubator Status Report: Axion

Sorry for the lateness. Report follows. - Morgan Axion Incubation Report --- The status file for Axion (http://incubator.apache.org/projects/axion.html) is up-to-date and incubation is progressing. By the next report, we expect to have completed the transfer from our licen

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 06:27 PM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:29:16 -0400 (Subject: Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)) Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Personally, I think it would be almost obscenely ironic if the Incubator, wh

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:29:16 -0400 (Subject: Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)) Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally, I think it would be almost obscenely ironic > if the Incubator, which is designed to help ensure the "Apache > Way"

RE: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > I don't know if everyone agrees, but I do favor a single point of reference > > for those documents. > likewise. and since they're educational to new apache participants, > the incubator seems like a good place to me. It will be intere

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

On 9/18/2003 10:38 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: I think that in Incubator, there need at least two or three persons who have real power. (One Chair and two Vice Chair?) I think we need people on the PMC who are doing the work, not expecting Chairs and Vice Chairs to do things for them. The

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > I don't know if everyone agrees, but I do favor a single point of reference > for those documents. likewise. and since they're educational to new apache participants, the incubator seems like a good place to me. > As for time, didn't you recently resign as Commons Cha

RE: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

> Mr. Ken Coar is rather HTTPD/ApacheCon oriented person. > Mr. Nicola Ken Barozzi is rather Jakarta/XML/Cocoon oriented person. > Mr. Paul Hammant is rather Jakarta/Avalon oriented person. There are some cultural differences that ought to be discussed, understood, and made use of, but I don't see

RE: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

> > I think that in Incubator, there need at least two or three > > persons who have real power. (One Chair and two Vice Chair?) I think we need people on the PMC who are doing the work, not expecting Chairs and Vice Chairs to do things for them. The people who work on the PMC, and in the project

RE: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

Ken, > i see the incubator as having two roles. one is the > entry path for new packages and their communities I think that everyone agrees on this, although not everyone may understand all of the nuances. For example, I wasn't clear on why a project should go through Incubator if there is an e

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

Jim Jagielski wrote: > Personally, I think it would be almost obscenely ironic > if the Incubator, which is designed to help ensure the "Apache > Way" in building communities and projects, has a PMC structure > which is totally unique within the ASF. ?? you mean the chix and valences bit? or th

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

Personally, I think it would be almost obscenely ironic if the Incubator, which is designed to help ensure the "Apache Way" in building communities and projects, has a PMC structure which is totally unique within the ASF. - To unsu

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

In ThoughtWorks we try to pair (no need to introduce XP is there?) on as much as possible... works well. It can even work distributed. - ph Hi, On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:51:13 +0200 "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I thought the same thing. Also, to tell the truth, I think that in

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

Hi, On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:51:13 +0200 "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I thought the same thing. Also, to tell the truth, I think that > > in Incubator, there need at least two or three persons who > > have real power. (One Chair and two Vice Chair?) > Why would we need more peo

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 09:17 AM, Sander Striker wrote: From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:07 PM I really hate to keep harping on this, but the whole idea of the PMC Chair having "power" somehow implies that the PMC itself is under the

RE: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:07 PM > I really hate to keep harping on this, but the whole > idea of the PMC Chair having "power" somehow implies that > the PMC itself is under the "whim" of the Chair. Yes, the > chair has the ultimate respo

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 08:51 AM, Sander Striker wrote: From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:09 AM [...] I thought the same thing. Also, to tell the truth, I think that in Incubator, there need at least two or three persons who have re

RE: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

> From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:09 AM [...] > I thought the same thing. Also, to tell the truth, I think that > in Incubator, there need at least two or three persons who > have real power. (One Chair and two Vice Chair?) Why would we ne

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

Can we all recall one big important thing: the PMC Chair's role is not to "run the PMC" (as we normally use that term). That is, in fact, the role of the PMC itself. The Chair has ultimate authority and responsibility and is also the one who reports to the board, but the power of the PMC is in the

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

Noel J. Bergman wrote: > I think that Nicola Ken Coar would do a fine job as PMC Chair. ;-) heh! > Ok, name games aside, I honestly don't know if Ken or Nicola Ken have any > substantively different views on what should happen with Incubator. what should happen, or what it should do? i don't

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: ... Ok, name games aside, I honestly don't know if Ken or Nicola Ken have any substantively different views on what should happen with Incubator. From what I gather, Ken Coar is probably the one on the Incubator PMC that has more similar views to mine. On the whole though,

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:18:16 -0400 (Subject: RE: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)) "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that Nicola Ken Coar would do a fine job as PMC Chair. ;-) ;-) > Ok, name games aside, I honestly don't kno

RE: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

I think that Nicola Ken Coar would do a fine job as PMC Chair. ;-) Ok, name games aside, I honestly don't know if Ken or Nicola Ken have any substantively different views on what should happen with Incubator. If they think so, I would be interested to hear them. Generally, I think that either K

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

== == == == == == == == == == == == == == Note: "Who is Nicola Ken Barozzi?" ... http://www.apache.org/~nicolaken/ ... http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html "Who is Ken Coar?" ... http://www.apache.org/~coar/ ... http://ken.coar.org/ "Who is Paul Hammant?" ... http://www.apache.org/~

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 10:05 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:15:43 -0400 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 09:14 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: I'd like to put my sincere plus one as the New Chair of the Apache Incubator

Re: cvs commit: incubator STATUS

On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 09:53 AM, Greg Stein wrote: Okay, agreed. The term "selection" threw me off. I read it as "selecting the chair" rather than "selecting the recommendation [to the Board]". In the future, the phrase "... actual recommendation" could be a bit clearer :-) Gotch

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:15:43 -0400 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 09:14 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: > > I'd like to put my sincere plus one as the New Chair of > > the Apache Incubator Project To > > > > [ ] Nicola Ken Barozzi > > [ ] Ken Coar >

Re: cvs commit: incubator STATUS

Okay, agreed. The term "selection" threw me off. I read it as "selecting the chair" rather than "selecting the recommendation [to the Board]". In the future, the phrase "... actual recommendation" could be a bit clearer :-) Cheers, -g On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:51:51AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote

Re: cvs commit: incubator STATUS

The board makes the final selection, but all resolutions state: WHEREAS, the membership of the Apache (whatever) Project Management Committee (PMC) have appointed... Since the PMC is responsible for the oversight, and is the entity delegated by the board for such, then they should have the decisio

Re: cvs commit: incubator STATUS

On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 01:22:24PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >... > +++ STATUS 17 Sep 2003 13:22:24 - 1.16 > @@ -13,11 +13,12 @@ > >1. Jim Jagieski has announced his intention to step down as chair > of the incubator project. A new chair needs to be selected. >

Re: [VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 09:14 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: I'd like to put my sincere plus one as the New Chair of the Apache Incubator Project To [ ] Nicola Ken Barozzi [ ] Ken Coar [ ] Paul Hammant ?? :) - To unsub

[VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)

On 17 Sep 2003 12:34:19 - (Subject: cvs commit: incubator STATUS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > +1. Jim Jagieski has announced his intention to step down as chair > + of the incubator project. A new chair needs to be selected. > + Current nominees are listed below; feel fre