Hi,
> That's actually why I asked James to pose the question on the general
> list. I wasn't particularly sure if he found the right file, based on the
> comments made by Justin and was hoping Justin could speak up to explain why
> it is or isn't an issue
I believe it wasn’t this example but tha
> On Jul 3, 2017, at 5:08 PM, James Bognar wrote:
>
> Hrm...that sort of complicates the example.
>
> Here's the example code that creates an Atom feed DTO with a copyright...
>
File file = new File("fileName");
Charset charset = Charset.forName("utf-8");
// read the copyright notice from the
Hrm...that sort of complicates the example.
Here's the example code that creates an Atom feed DTO with a copyright...
Feed f = new Feed()
...
.rights("Copyright (c) 2016, Apache Foundation")
...
How about just "Copyright (c) ..."?
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
Hi James,
Instead of including "Copyright (c) 2001, Apache Foobar Foundation" in the
sample code, would it be possible/easy to "assume the copyright notice is in a
file and include the file contents here".
That is probably how you would want to do it anyway, considering the task of
updating c
> Also, why make the example strange? Why not take a real copyright header
> for an example?
A real copyright header can be mistaken for an actual copyright which gets
flagged during releases.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Jul 3, 2017 3:43 PM, "John D. Ament" wrote:
On Jul 3, 2017 3:43 PM, "John D. Ament" wrote:
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:28 PM Ted Dunning wrote:
> That's confusing. Here are some questions and thoughts.
>
...
>
>
wouldn't get flagged. I had posed on the list "1955 - 1971, Fake Atom
Enterprises" which obviously would be an invalid copyrig
Yes...to clarify, it's not a real copyright. It's an example of a
copyright.
So the question is what copyright should I use so that it's not mistaken
for a real copyright.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:28 PM Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> > That's co
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:28 PM Ted Dunning wrote:
> That's confusing. Here are some questions and thoughts.
>
> A) 2001?
>
> B) the only Apache foundation is the Apache software foundation. What did
> you mean by foobar?
>
> C) you don't need a copyright notice on code included in the documentati
That's confusing. Here are some questions and thoughts.
A) 2001?
B) the only Apache foundation is the Apache software foundation. What did
you mean by foobar?
C) you don't need a copyright notice on code included in the documentation.
Save that for the copy of the sample code that you put into a
Need some quick guidance.
On the release vote for Juneau 6.3.0, Justin Mclean made this note...
"There's a number of "Copyright (c) 2016, Apache Foundation” in the
documentation you may want to update the year."
I tracked it down to sample code where the copyright statement itself was
sample code
10 matches
Mail list logo
