t; Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 3:31 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Looking for additional mentor for Edgent with community growth
> ideas/focus
>
> The Edgent community has just about all the pieces in place, great well
> designed reliable software for an
_
From: Katherine Marsden
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 3:31 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Looking for additional mentor for Edgent with community growth
ideas/focus
The Edgent community has just about all the pieces in place, great well
designed reliable software for analyti
Will,
(moving general@incubator to BCC)
I'll point out that the expectations of a podling are skewed based on how
that podling is operating. If we see a high level of on list activity,
making it clear that its list first, it may make sense to graduate a less
diverse podling, simply because its c
Hi John, I'm glad you enjoyed the presentation, ApacheCon was a great
forum.
All mentors are currently active, and right now the way in which Edgent
most needs mentorship is in its outreach to developers. From a technical
perspective, I think Edgent is mature for its age and number of committers,
On 5/16/17 2:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
William,
Great presentation this afternoon.
I'd like offer to help you guys as a mentor, you do currently have 4
mentors. Are all 4 mentors active in the project?
Hi John, I am not involved in the project from a technical perspective,
except I helpe
t; The only significant problem I see at this point is growing the size and
> > diversity of the user and development community. Our last new committer
> > was a year ago and just saw only two new subscribers to the dev list in
> our
> > last reporting period.
> >
>
m I see at this point is growing the size and
> diversity of the user and development community. Our last new committer
> was a year ago and just saw only two new subscribers to the dev list in our
> last reporting period.
>
> I think it is a good time to bring on a new mentor for Edgen
only two new subscribers to the dev list in
our last reporting period.
I think it is a good time to bring on a new mentor for Edgent to help
kick start community growth. Any interest?
At Apachecon this week there are a couple of talks about Edgent. Please
attend if you are there and spread
On Dec 23, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On December 23, 2005 12:47:26 PM -0500 Jim Jagielski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Q: The Incubator controls who leaves... who controls who
enters? It seems like both are needed.
A: Yes, and there are controls for who enters a
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> Yes, but we can't think of incubation failure as "failure" - that's
> actually a successful outcome for the incubator, as it's doing its
> job in that case. Not everyone will want to work our way, not every
> project will catch a diverse community interest, etc
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On December 23, 2005 12:47:26 PM -0500 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Q: The Incubator controls who leaves... who controls who
enters? It seems like both are needed.
A: Yes, and there are controls for who enters as well.
Applicants must be
--On December 23, 2005 12:47:26 PM -0500 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Q: The Incubator controls who leaves... who controls who
enters? It seems like both are needed.
A: Yes, and there are controls for who enters as well.
Applicants must be sponsored by a current PM
ut "out of
control" hardly describes it. Note that whether or
not the Incubator is in or out of control is a
different question that anything regarding growth.
Q: Ok Mister Smart guy, is the ASF growing too quickly?
A: I'm sure that some members feel that we may be doi
On Dec 22, 2005, at 2:51 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 12/21/2005 7:22 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Right now any PMC can automatically ok projects into incubator. How
about we change that rule? So that the only pmc that can approve a
proposal is the incubator PMC.
On 12/22/05, Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > On 12/21/2005 7:22 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> Right now any PMC can automatically ok projects into incubator. How
> >> about we change that rule? So that the only pmc that can approve a
> >>
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 12/21/2005 7:22 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Right now any PMC can automatically ok projects into incubator. How
about we change that rule? So that the only pmc that can approve a
proposal is the incubator PMC.
++1
Without putting too much thought into my re
On 12/21/2005 7:22 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Right now any PMC can automatically ok projects into incubator. How
about we change that rule? So that the only pmc that can approve a
proposal is the incubator PMC.
Without putting too much thought into my response I think that the
I
Folks,
Right now any PMC can automatically ok projects into incubator. How
about we change that rule? So that the only pmc that can approve a
proposal is the incubator PMC.
thanks,
dims
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---
18 matches
Mail list logo
