On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Niall,
>
>>> [...]
>>> Dist is the active archive. The archive.apache.org is the "deep archive".
>>> Both should exist, and both should have a copy of the data.
>>>
>>
>> Dist isn't an archive - its a distribution area archive.a
Hi Niall,
>> [...]
>> Dist is the active archive. The archive.apache.org is the "deep archive".
>> Both should exist, and both should have a copy of the data.
>>
>
> Dist isn't an archive - its a distribution area archive.apache.org is
> the archive.
I respectfully disagree.
Cheers,
Chris
>
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
>
>>
>> "dist" is a distribution area - mirrored so that when people download
>> they usually end up on a mirror site. This spreads the load of people
>> downloading our software. Projects shouldn't be linking to specific
>> artifact
>
> "dist" is a distribution area - mirrored so that when people download
> they usually end up on a mirror site. This spreads the load of people
> downloading our software. Projects shouldn't be linking to specific
> artifacts in the dist area - they should be linking to a download page
> where
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2011, at 8:56 PM, David Crossley wrote:
>
>> Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>>> Hmmm,
>>>
>>> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
>>> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e
will do, I know Joe S. lurks here -- Joe -- do you get what I'm saying? Am I
crazy? (don't answer that) ^_^
On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:08 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> I am just following current ASF practice.
>
> I agree with the importance of preserving archives
> and reliable links to past resource
I am just following current ASF practice.
I agree with the importance of preserving archives
and reliable links to past resources.
Please take this up with ASF Infrastructure.
This Incubator forum has too narrow scope.
By the way, unrelated to my orginal post,
ASF Infra is currently preparing to
On Mar 2, 2011, at 8:56 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>> Hmmm,
>>
>> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
>> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
>> that point users to our Incubator relea
Hi Sebb,
>> Hmmm,
>>
>> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
>> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
>> that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
>> links. I realize that archive.apach
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hmmm,
>
> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
> that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
> links. I realize th
On 3 March 2011 03:19, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hmmm,
>
> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
> that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
Hmmm,
I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
links. I realize that archive.apache.org keeps a copy, but foll
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:34 PM, David Crossley wrote:
>> For Shiro (which is now a TLP), I just moved the artifacts out of
>> /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/shiro and then deleted the shiro
>> directory.
>
> Remember that stuff is automatically copied to archives:
> http://archive.apache.org/d
Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
> For Shiro (which is now a TLP), I just moved the artifacts out of
> /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/shiro and then deleted the shiro
> directory.
Remember that stuff is automatically copied to archives:
http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/shiro/
http://archive.apa
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:39 PM, David Crossley wrote:
>
> For example many still have remains on the "distribution" mirrors.
>
> We know that some projects have only recently graduated, so will
> not yet have done a release as a TLP. Therefore your old release
> needs to stay there until that hap
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:39 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> Would these projects please tidy up, following your graduation from
> the Incubator.
>
> abdera aries buildr chemistry esme oodt river shiro thrift uima
>
> For example many still have remains on the "distribution" mirrors.
>
> We know
Would these projects please tidy up, following your graduation from
the Incubator.
abdera aries buildr chemistry esme oodt river shiro thrift uima
For example many still have remains on the "distribution" mirrors.
We know that some projects have only recently graduated, so will
not yet have don
On 05/24/2010 10:56 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
The following are listed this month:
abdera buildr log4php openwebbeans subversion trafficserver uima
Its done for Log4PHP, thanks for the reminder
Trafficserver is cleaned up too, sorry for the delay.
-- leif
---
> -Original Message-
> From: David Crossley [mailto:cross...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 May 2010 10:59 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Graduated projects please tidy up
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 David Crossley wrote:
> >
> > I
> The following are listed this month:
> abdera buildr log4php openwebbeans subversion trafficserver uima
Its done for Log4PHP, thanks for the reminder
Cheers,
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.ap
On May 24, 2010, at 8:58 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> The following are listed this month:
> abdera buildr log4php openwebbeans subversion trafficserver uima
Thanks David. OpenWebBeans should be clear, now. I just removed Incubator
distribution.
--kevan
---
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 David Crossley wrote:
>
> I have noticed a trend lately, that Graduated projects
> are not tidying up after themselves. They should be
> self-sufficient by this stage.
>
> For example, if they don't remove themselves from
> the Wiki page "ReportingSchedule" then they will be s
I have noticed a trend lately, that Graduated projects
are not tidying up after themselves. They should be
self-sufficient by this stage.
For example, if they don't remove themselves from
the Wiki page "ReportingSchedule" then they will be still
listed to report this month. Poor Clutch only gets t
23 matches
Mail list logo
