Status report from the Geronimo PPMC
* The project status file (/home/cvs/incubator-geronimo/STATUS)
is up to date.
* Geir Magnusson is preparing a response to the JBoss letter for
approval by the ASF Board. It concludes that there is no validity
to the cl
vian Tanase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 12:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: I would like to join the Geronimo project
>
> as a developer, please find my resume attached.
>
> Cheers,
> --Octavian
-
as a developer, please find my resume attached.
Cheers,
--Octavian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/2/03 10:37 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Ted Leung wrote:
On 12/1/03 10:00 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Not to mention Xerces (definitely a person) and Alexandria (city in
Egypt), Merlin (religious and possibly a person's name), Pluto
(religious and possibly a geographical place, depending on whet
Sander Striker wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 09:29, Bruce Snyder wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Berin Lautenbach said:
BL>> 2) Identify the PPMC who gets to name this project - and hold them
BL>> accountable for their decision.
BL>
BL>+1. I think the Incubator PMC is in a kind of unique po
On Dec 3, 2003, at 7:37 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Ted Leung wrote:
Xerces is a butterfly. It is not a misspelling of Xerxes (the person)
According to http://www.xerces.org/Xerces.htm
"The French entomologist Boisduval named the butterfly for King
Xerxes, but retained the French spelling, Xerces.
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 09:29, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Berin Lautenbach said:
>
> BL>> 2) Identify the PPMC who gets to name this project - and hold them
> BL>> accountable for their decision.
> BL>
> BL>+1. I think the Incubator PMC is in a kind of unique position. We
This one time, at band camp, Berin Lautenbach said:
BL>> 2) Identify the PPMC who gets to name this project - and hold them
BL>> accountable for their decision.
BL>
BL>+1. I think the Incubator PMC is in a kind of unique position. We are
BL>trying to ensure that new projects/new committers in
On 30 Nov 2003, at 21:20, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
The project was initiated on condition that the name would be
reconsidered prior to becoming a TLP.
Agreed. My feeling is lets postpone this discussion until becoming a
TLP.
We're gonna have to move CVS repos, change mail lists etc anyways
when
Ted Leung wrote:
On 12/1/03 10:00 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Not to mention Xerces (definitely a person) and Alexandria (city in
Egypt), Merlin (religious and possibly a person's name), Pluto
(religious and possibly a geographical place, depending on whether you
think planets have geography), and
On 12/1/03 10:00 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Not to mention Xerces (definitely a person) and Alexandria (city in
Egypt), Merlin (religious and possibly a person's name), Pluto
(religious and possibly a geographical place, depending on whether you
think planets have geography), and possibly Avalon (
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 07:28:09AM +0100, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:04:46PM -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >> Put in tangible terms, I would much prefer to see a incubator puruse a
> >> vote of [no] confidence in the Geronimo PPC than to have the incuba
> Geronimo was an Apache was he not? So it definitley seems odd that we
> can name our whole organization after the people of Geronimo but not
> Geronimo himself (yes, I know the name came from "a patchy server, but
> that's not obvious to anyone most of the time).
I understand that Andy Oliv
Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:04:46PM -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> Put in tangible terms, I would much prefer to see a incubator puruse a
>> vote of [no] confidence in the Geronimo PPC than to have the incubator
>> continue to debate the name of the project.
> Calling this a bikesh
On Dec 1, 2003, at 4:18 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
Hmm, how about:
Apache ctx.lookup("apache/j2ee/name");
It's unpronounceable, but so is httpd ;-)
I can pronounce it, but I then have to wipe my screen :D
geir
-Brian
On Monday, December 1, 2003, at 03:42 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Dec 0
.S. Hey! I have an idea! instead of renaming the Geronimo project,
why don't we make up a symbol that will mean "The Project Formerly
Known as Geronimo"
--
Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:04:46PM -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Put in tangible terms, I would much prefer to see a incubator puruse a
> vote of [no] confidence in the Geronimo PPC than to have the incubator
> continue to debate the name of the project.
There is no Geronimo PMC.
The mere fact that
Hmm, how about:
Apache ctx.lookup("apache/j2ee/name");
It's unpronounceable, but so is httpd ;-)
-Brian
On Monday, December 1, 2003, at 03:42 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:18:15AM -0800, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
On 12/1/03 12:16 AM, "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:18:15AM -0800, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> On 12/1/03 12:16 AM, "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 07:10:16PM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >> ...
> >> Appropriating the name "Geronimo" for our uses will cause, and has
> >> caused, controversy.
On Monday, December 1, 2003, at 08:06 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Then we have to prevent such discussions in the future by setting
clearer rules. Ideas?
Possible addition:
"The name should not be a name of a person, geographical entity, of
religious nature or generally insulting. Since the definition
>>> 2) Identify the PPMC who gets to name this project - and hold them
>>> accountable for their decision.
> > We are not deciding on the name but on the need or not to have a name
> > change. In case for a name change, this will surely be the case.
> At which point, they will be autonomous until t
Sam Ruby wrote:
Put in tangible terms, I would much prefer to see a incubator puruse a
vote of [no] confidence in the Geronimo PPC than to have the incubator
continue to debate the name of the project.
That would clear up a lot.
+1 from a non-voter.
.V
-
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I very much like the government model that the ASF board operates on.
It does not meddle in PMC decisions. If the board does not like the way
some project is operating - it typically has only one rather blunt
instrument to use: disband the PMC. This has the nice side bene
> I very much like the government model that the ASF board operates on.
> It does not meddle in PMC decisions. If the board does not like the way
> some project is operating - it typically has only one rather blunt
> instrument to use: disband the PMC. This has the nice side benefit as
> it encou
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
...
1) Have the incubator PMC identify a clear set of constraints that
apply to *all* names. Vote on them, document them, and move on.
Right. What is our policy?
ATM here is our rule:
"
Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist a
> I'm changing my vote, not because I don't believe in my earlier
> thoughts, but becausewe are wasting so much time and energy on something
> that should be much simpler.
This gets my vote for the most unprincipled vote in this whole thread.
Andreas
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Aaron Bannert wrote:
The Geronimo folks are talking about making logos and there seems to
be a desire to have official signoff on the name. Please vote on one
of the following choices:
[ ] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
[ ] - Punt the decision t
Sam Ruby wrote:
...
1) Have the incubator PMC identify a clear set of constraints that apply
to *all* names. Vote on them, document them, and move on.
Right. What is our policy?
ATM here is our rule:
"
Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist and
check www.nameprotect.co
"Brian Behlendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Despite this, I like Geronimo as a name. However, I think it'd be a poor
> choice for two reasons previously noted: other software products already
> using that name, and the *potential* it has to cause quite a bit of
> trouble. It's really not t
Sam Ruby wrote:
The inevitable result of these two factors is an interminable discussion
on the naming of a project.
IMHO, the right answer is *not* to buck this up to the incubator PMC, or
to members, or *gasp* to the board. A much better approach would be:
1) Have the incubator PMC identify
On 12/1/03 12:16 AM, "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 07:10:16PM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote:
>> ...
>> Appropriating the name "Geronimo" for our uses will cause, and has
>> caused, controversy.
>
> I believe the only controversy has been from people who state that th
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 07:10:16PM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote:
>...
> Appropriating the name "Geronimo" for our uses will cause, and has
> caused, controversy.
I believe the only controversy has been from people who state that the
name will cause controversy. IOW, it is entirely self-generated, rathe
Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Roy made a comment that a condition for leaving the incubator is that
> > the name be changed. I hadn't heard that before
> I said that the condition was that it would be reconsidered
Sorry to misunderstand. Thanks for the clarification.
-
Roy made a comment that a condition for leaving the incubator is that
the
name be changed. I hadn't heard that before, but those are two
incompatible
views.
I said that the condition was that it would be reconsidered; basically,
that any comments to the effect that it is now "too late" or the na
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Personally, I view Political Correctness as being closer to Orwellian
> thought control than a sincere attempt to instill appreciation for, and
> tolerance of, diversity.
And I think "Political Correctness" is a term invented by the right to
pretend th
> 1) The incubator PMC is acquiring new PMC members, and will
> asymptotically aproach the list of all ASF committers who
> are involved in any way with any aspect of growth or
> regeneration of code bases. In short, it will become the
> epitame of an uber umbrella PMC.
As you are aware, we are d
Leo Simons wrote:
And how is this not a community decision?
IMV, the community has decided, and making a different
decision now would be overruling that decision by the pmc.
Which is valid, of course, but I don't have to like it :D
+1
Stefano recently used the term bureaucracy to describe aspects
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 08:53:55PM +0100, Leo Simons wrote:
Aaron Bannert wrote:
[ -0 ] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
[ -0 ] - Punt the decision to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ -1 ] - Disallow "Geronimo" but allow the committers to come up with any
other nam
The project was initiated on condition that the name would be
reconsidered prior to becoming a TLP. I don't really care at this
point, except to note that if we do get an objection regarding the
name from folks who have a right to object, then the project will
have to change its name and everyone
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 08:53:55PM +0100, Leo Simons wrote:
> Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > [ -0 ] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
> > [ -0 ] - Punt the decision to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [ -1 ] - Disallow "Geronimo" but allow the committers to come up with any
> > other name th
Aaron Bannert wrote:
[ -0 ] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
[ -0 ] - Punt the decision to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ -1 ] - Disallow "Geronimo" but allow the committers to come up with any
other name they want (barring anything inappropriate).
I don't like multiple-choice votes
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
It should be left up to the project unless Geronimo is truly deemed
inappropriate.
The developers may wish to avoid the whole issue by renaming the
codebase to something else but not be forced out of the name
because it's perceived to be controversial by some.
Unle
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 05:04:52PM +0100, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
> Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> >The fact of the matter is that, in the USA, any mention of any minority
> >(aka non-white) historical figure or group of people, by persons not in
> >that group, is guaranteed to cause someone to be offend
rands consistent.
Cheers,
Sally
--- "Brian. W. Fitzpatrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: [Fwd: [VOTE] Official Name for "Geronimo"
> Project]
> From: "Brian. W. Fitzpatrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sat
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> I must admit that it is totally beyond my understanding how one
> can waste so much thoughts on the *possibility* of offending
> someone with something
Welcome to the wonderful world of Political Correctness. There are plenty
of cases of political correctness that are the
Rich Bowen wrote:
The fact of the matter is that, in the USA, any mention of any minority
(aka non-white) historical figure or group of people, by persons not in
that group, is guaranteed to cause someone to be offended.
I must admit that it is totally beyond my understanding how one can waste so
On Nov 29, 2003, at 2:20 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 29 Nov 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
It's not like it's "Geronimo: the society of baby seal clubbers" or
something nasty like that. It's a piece of free software that gives
people some choice and it uses the name of a native indian hero. So
som
Aaron Bannert wrote:
The Geronimo folks are talking about making logos and there seems to
be a desire to have official signoff on the name. Please vote on one
of the following choices:
[X] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
[ ] - Punt the decision to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ ] - D
I honestly didn't think the use of the name in this context was an
abuse.
I don't think it is abuse -- he is a historical figure and he died
over 100 years ago, so there is no real fear of being sued for it.
I just think it is wrong.
Roy
> The Geronimo folks are talking about making logos and there seems to
> be a desire to have official signoff on the name. Please vote on one
> of the following choices:
[ ] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
[ ] - Punt the decision to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[X] - Disallow "Geronim
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 18:45, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > It's not like it's "Geronimo: the society of baby seal clubbers" or
> > something nasty like that. It's a piece of free software that gives
> > people some choice and it uses the name of a native indian her
> It should be left up to the project unless Geronimo is truly deemed
> inappropriate.
> The developers may wish to avoid the whole issue by renaming the
> codebase to something else but not be forced out of the name
> because it's perceived to be controversial by some.
Unless the Membership or t
On 29 Nov 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Of course I'm listening and am also asking you to think. It's
> controversial for a reason: most likely it's because some indigenous
> peoples find the use of their names in some contexts to be derogatory or
> offensive. I'm just asking people to think if in
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 18:35, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Apache was named after the Apache tribes -- "a patchy" server was an
> afterthought. We've generally avoided any discussion of the topic
> because involvement of a native american "activist" will only result
> in trouble for us. Those people a
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:25:40PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> [ ] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
> [ ] - Punt the decision to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [X] - Disallow "Geronimo" but allow the committers to come up with any
> other name they want (barring anything inappr
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 17:56, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > All I'm trying to express is that the name is not being used
> > in any derogatory sense and that the name Geronimo is being
> > used in a positive light.
>
> Tell that to the people protesting sports teams using the na
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 14:50, Brian. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 13:41, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 14:31, Brian. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> >
> > > > It's not like it's "Geronimo: the society of baby seal clubbers" or
> > > > something nasty like that. It's a piec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > It's not like it's "Geronimo: the society of baby seal clubbers" or
> > something nasty like that. It's a piece of free software that gives
> > people some choice and
On 29 Nov 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> It's not like it's "Geronimo: the society of baby seal clubbers" or
> something nasty like that. It's a piece of free software that gives
> people some choice and it uses the name of a native indian hero. So some
> coke and twinkie consuming, pasty white prog
Apache was named after the Apache tribes -- "a patchy" server was an
afterthought. We've generally avoided any discussion of the topic
because involvement of a native american "activist" will only result
in trouble for us. Those people are not Apache -- they don't even have
a clue. The various t
On 29 Nov 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Geronimo was an Apache was he not? So it definitley seems odd that we
> can name our whole organization after the people of Geronimo but not
> Geronimo himself (yes, I know the name came from "a patchy server, but
> that's not obvious to anyone most of the ti
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> All I'm trying to express is that the name is not being used
> in any derogatory sense and that the name Geronimo is being
> used in a positive light.
Tell that to the people protesting sports teams using the name "Braves" or
"Redskins", or anything else having a Native Amer
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 13:41, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 14:31, Brian. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> > > It's not like it's "Geronimo: the society of baby seal clubbers" or
> > > something nasty like that. It's a piece of free software that gives
> > > people some choice and it uses t
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 14:31, Brian. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > It's not like it's "Geronimo: the society of baby seal clubbers" or
> > something nasty like that. It's a piece of free software that gives
> > people some choice and it uses the name of a native indian hero. So some
> > coke and twinki
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 13:11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 13:47, Brian. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 12:36, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >
> > > So the ASF has actually received messages from Apache indians that are
> > > offended by the use of the name Apache?
> >
>
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 13:11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 13:47, Brian. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 12:36, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >
> > > So the ASF has actually received messages from Apache indians that are
> > > offended by the use of the name Apache?
> >
>
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> [X] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
> [ ] - Punt the decision to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [ ] - Disallow "Geronimo" but allow the committers to come up with any
> other name they want (barring anything inappropriate).
Unless
On 29 Nov 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> It's not like it's "Geronimo: the society of baby seal clubbers" or
> something nasty like that. It's a piece of free software that gives
> people some choice and it uses the name of a native indian hero. So some
> coke and twinkie consuming, pasty white pr
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 13:47, Brian. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 12:36, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > So the ASF has actually received messages from Apache indians that are
> > offended by the use of the name Apache?
>
> I don't know... take it up with the board. I do, however, kno
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 12:36, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> So the ASF has actually received messages from Apache indians that are
> offended by the use of the name Apache?
I don't know... take it up with the board. I do, however, know that
using Native American/American Indian names for just about anyt
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 13:08, Brian. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > Geronimo was an Apache was he not? So it definitley seems odd that we
> > can name our whole organization after the people of Geronimo but not
> > Geronimo himself (yes, I know the name came from "a patchy server, but
> > that's not obv
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 13:08, Brian. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 11:55, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 12:31, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> > > "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >
> > > > And to clarify: Native American Indian tribe names are inappr
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 11:55, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 12:31, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> > "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > And to clarify: Native American Indian tribe names are inappropiate.
> >
> > Given the name "Apache" .. this is an inconsistent
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 12:31, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > And to clarify: Native American Indian tribe names are inappropiate.
>
> Given the name "Apache" .. this is an inconsistent statement. Is this
> (a new) political correctness thing or so
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 16:25, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> The Geronimo folks are talking about making logos and there seems to
> be a desire to have official signoff on the name. Please vote on one
> of the following choices:
>
>
> [+1] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
> [ ] - Punt
"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> And to clarify: Native American Indian tribe names are inappropiate.
Given the name "Apache" .. this is an inconsistent statement. Is this
(a new) political correctness thing or some policy?
I'm obviously not native American, but if I were I'd per
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 22:25, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> The Geronimo folks are talking about making logos and there seems to
> be a desire to have official signoff on the name. Please vote on one
> of the following choices:
>
>
> [ ] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
> [ ] - Punt t
On Nov 28, 2003, at 1:25 PM, Aaron Bannert wrote:
[ ] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
[ ] - Punt the decision to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ +1] - Disallow "Geronimo" but allow the committers to come up with
any
other name they want (barring anything inappropriate).
-Fitz
The Geronimo folks are talking about making logos and there seems to
be a desire to have official signoff on the name. Please vote on one
of the following choices:
[ ] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
[ ] - Punt the decision to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ ] - Disallow "Geronimo" but
Hi:
I very admire the apache group and your robust and powerful projects.
I was so exciting when heard that the Apache Geronimo project has been
launched. I want to join and contrubute myself to this project. How to do
this? Please tell me in detail.
I have worked 7 years as software
Hello
My name is Henrikh Karpynskyi
I am Sr Software Engineer (REI Systems) with 6+ years
of expirience. Java - 4yrs, J2EE - 3 yrs
I have expirience also with RMI ,CORBA and WebServices
and would be very intrested in participating in Apache
J2EE project.
I could spend for this project at least
Let me know the process ...
Jaya
=
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I would like to find out more about participation in the Apache
Geronimo project. I am currently a web developer at Johnson and
Johnson. I designed and maintain the finance department website, and am
lead architect and developer on a web application which provides the
finance
Hi,
I would like to be a contributor to this project. I am an experienced
enterprise solution developer in Java, C++ and etc.
Please let me know,
-Abhijit
===
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged inform
Hi,
I would like to get involved in the Apache Geronimo project as a
developer.Please send me more details about this project.
Thanks,
Jagadhi.
_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAI
short of a place to write down my thoughts, I'll
settle for this rant/spam. Sorry.
Again, Thanks for the Geronimo project!! I love you
guys!!
Rob
_
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
Se me
Hi,
My name is Arjun Mukherjee and I am the Chief Software Architect of Virtusa
India Ltd.
I am proponent of collaboratively developed software and have benefited
tremendously from them in my career. I would like to contribute to the
Geronimo project.
My Brief Profile:
> Total Experience:
Hi
I am a programmer with more than 11 years experience in Smalltalk and Java
projects. Currently I am working on J2EE projects.
I was wondering whether I could contribute to this project.
Cheers
Sam Vaitheeswaran
NOTICE - Thi
89 matches
Mail list logo
