RE: Flex Status

2012-05-10 Thread Franklin, Matthew B.
>-Original Message- >From: Greg Reddin [mailto:gred...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 12:29 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Flex Status > >On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Dave Fisher >wrote: >> Some day I'll write about t

Re: Flex Status

2012-05-10 Thread Greg Reddin
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Some day I'll write about the differences between AOO and Flex as large > incubating projects, the contrasts are amazing. That would be very interesting. Greg - To unsubsc

Re: Flex Status

2012-05-10 Thread Dave Fisher
On May 10, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] >> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:44 AM >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Flex Status >> >&

RE: Flex Status

2012-05-10 Thread Franklin, Matthew B.
>-Original Message- >From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] >Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:44 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Flex Status > > >On May 10, 2012, at 2:57 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>

Re: Flex Status

2012-05-10 Thread Dave Fisher
On May 10, 2012, at 2:57 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> I think we'll be able to persuade the PPMC that they don't really want to >> manage >> their own JIRA instance once that is done. So, they have a little infra >> delay. > > Ther

Re: Flex Status

2012-05-10 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > I think we'll be able to persuade the PPMC that they don't really want to > manage > their own JIRA instance once that is done. So, they have a little infra delay. There's a bit of history behind this. Flex was getting a bit frustrated a

Re: Flex Status

2012-05-09 Thread Dave Fisher
On May 9, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Greg Reddin wrote: > Actually we discovered after this draft report had been written that we are > not supposed to report this month. It should probably be removed from the > incubator report. > > I would not classify the attitude about the RC as negativity. The pr

Re: Flex Status

2012-05-09 Thread Greg Reddin
Actually we discovered after this draft report had been written that we are not supposed to report this month. It should probably be removed from the incubator report. I would not classify the attitude about the RC as negativity. The project is complex with a long history and I imagine it will

Flex Status

2012-05-09 Thread Franklin, Matthew B.
I have reviewed the flex report and community and didn't find any major issues. The small things I found are: 1) The report appears to be written by a single person 2) This person appears to be disheartened a bit ("We expect the initial RC's to be rejected as we finalize licensing and other p

Re: Flex status

2012-03-12 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/12/12 9:39 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote: >> >> It's a bit unfortunate that the migration is taking so long. Once you >> have everything in place, it would be great if you could take some >> time (perhaps together with people from OpenOffice) to compile a list >> of lessons learned for

Re: Flex status

2012-03-12 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Jukka, On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> ...Resolve trademark donation or licensing > > I assume this is being handled by the PPMC together with the Apache > legal & trademark teams. So no direct action by the Incubator PMC > needed?.. That's correct - it's taking more

Flex status

2012-03-10 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, Thanks for the report, Flex! I was reviewing the report and have a few thoughts and questions: > Resolve trademark donation or licensing I assume this is being handled by the PPMC together with the Apache legal & trademark teams. So no direct action by the Incubator PMC needed? > Complete