On 12 August 2014 08:52, jan i wrote:
> On 12 August 2014 08:53, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>
> Documents are source code written in a natural language :-)
>
>
and without any tests.
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it
On 12 August 2014 08:53, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:32 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> >> ...if a podling/TLP were to receive a donation of
> >> documentation from a third party, should that go
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:32 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> ...if a podling/TLP were to receive a donation of
>> documentation from a third party, should that go through the same reviews
>> as source code donations?...
>
> IMO ye
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:32 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...if a podling/TLP were to receive a donation of
> documentation from a third party, should that go through the same reviews
> as source code donations?...
IMO yes.
Flex did something like that in
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearan
Hi all
I was wondering - if a podling/TLP were to receive a donation of
documentation from a third party, should that go through the same reviews
as source code donations?
John
