HI,
> I increasingly tend to agree. However, if we put the onus on PPMCs to police
> inactive mentors, there should probably be a documented process in place
> (which it is [1]).
If mentors can’t sign off reports on a frequent basis I think the PPMC should
ask for them to be replaced. If they
I increasingly tend to agree. However, if we put the onus on PPMCs to police
inactive mentors, there should probably be a documented process in place (which
it is [1]).
My concern with that policy is the potential for a chilling effect. Mentors are
more often than not ASF Members. I can easily
There was a long thread about absent mentors a few months ago[1]. The consensus
on the thread seemed to be to introduce some metrics. I was and am skeptical of
that approach because it requires constant attention from the IPMC.
The solution I advocated in that thread is to encourage podlings to
Hi,
> What is the process of essentially off-boarding unresponsive and inactive
> mentors with the sole aim of attracting new mentors who can inject life
> into various aspects of podling maturity?
I’d just ask them if they can continue in the role or still have the cycles to
help. If they can’t
Hi Folks,
What is the process of essentially off-boarding unresponsive and inactive
mentors with the sole aim of attracting new mentors who can inject life
into various aspects of podling maturity?
Lewis
--
http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc
