Re: CommonsRDF petering out

2015-11-03 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi, On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:09 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > This is my opinion right now. I think one of the struggles with this > podling is that they're their own consumers. It's going to be hard for > them to grow beyond themselves because the consumers are the producers > right now. They'

Re: CommonsRDF petering out

2015-11-03 Thread John D. Ament
This is my opinion right now. I think one of the struggles with this podling is that they're their own consumers. It's going to be hard for them to grow beyond themselves because the consumers are the producers right now. They're simply providing a default implementation of a spec, which may onl

Re: CommonsRDF petering out

2015-11-03 Thread Lewis John Mcgibbney
Hi Folks, Yes it has been slow to date there is no doubt. The community has seen little activity however that is not to say that no one cares. I think we can hash this out over in the dev list and see where it goes. Thanks Lewis On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:43 PM, wrote: > >Looking at the email arc

Re: CommonsRDF petering out

2015-11-03 Thread Rob Vesse
On 03/11/2015 01:08, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >Looking at the email archives just now, it looks to me like commons RDF is >finding it difficult to build a community and maintain any serious >momentum. Seeing only a few emails or commits for months on end raises >red >flags to me. A project that pet