On 01.10.2014 05:41, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>>> To the concrete question, the Subversion project never calls a strict
>>> [VOTE] for new committers or PMC members. We discuss first, and th
As an additional reference, here's a previous thread on the topic:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201303.mbox/%3ccapfnckijy6tm5tycfn7msch6h0v_ear7ws5qmftegaoo+do...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Cheers,
Brett
On 26 Sep 2014, at 1:59 pm, Alex Harui wrote:
> In a past discussion
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > To the concrete question, the Subversion project never calls a strict
> > [VOTE] for new committers or PMC members. We discuss first, and that sets
> > the direction. People throw out
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> To the concrete question, the Subversion project never calls a strict
> [VOTE] for new committers or PMC members. We discuss first, and that sets
> the direction. People throw out +1 messages, but that is "sure, make it so"
> rather than a true
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>...
> Specifically, we (CouchDB) see voting as the failure mode of a
> discussion (a useful one non-the-less), or as a last-step requirement
> to officiate a particular set of project-level decisions (that are
> fully enumerated in the bylaws)
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:52 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> ...The HTTP Server project has successfully operated by unanimity...
As a side note, I often tell people that IMO the HTTP Server is so
modular because people couldn't agree on things - it's much easier to
get consensus and sometimes
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> The HTTP Server PMC has succeeded in working through these issues without
> evicting a project member, and continuing to make progress.
>
There is a lot of credit due for this.
Of course, there are different stresses on each project.
e become so invested
>> in the foundation and its projects.
>> >
>> > Sometimes it's not possible to reach unanimous consensus. In such
>> situations the community needs to delay the vote (they agree the concerns
>> are appropriate) or they use voting to br
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> In a past discussion about by-laws, some folks were adamant that voting
> for new committer and PMC members be consensus votes so a single person
> can block the adding of a candidate.
>
> Do any projects use some form of majority voting for ne
gt; then in at the earliest opportunity they may never have become so
> invested
> > in the foundation and its projects.
> > >
> > > Sometimes it's not possible to reach unanimous consensus. In such
> > situations the community needs to delay the vote (they agre
n the foundation and its projects.
> >
> > Sometimes it's not possible to reach unanimous consensus. In such
> situations the community needs to delay the vote (they agree the concerns
> are appropriate) or they use voting to break the deadlock. How the vote is
> conducted
hey agree the concerns are
> appropriate) or they use voting to break the deadlock. How the vote is
> conducted is covered well by Joe.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> From: Joe Brockmeier<mailto:j...@zonker.net>
> Sent: 9/26/2014 5
Phone
From: Joe Brockmeier<mailto:j...@zonker.net>
Sent: 9/26/2014 5:00 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org<mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Committer Voting and Vetos
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014, at 10:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> In a past
Hey Alex
If during a new committer vote someone is giving a negative vote then the
reasoning should be included with that vote and a discussion can follow
around why the person was given the negative vote, this should all occur on
the private@ mailing list for that project. If there is hesitation a
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014, at 10:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> In a past discussion about by-laws, some folks were adamant that voting
> for new committer and PMC members be consensus votes so a single person
> can block the adding of a candidate.
>
> Do any projects use some form of majority voting for n
In a past discussion about by-laws, some folks were adamant that voting
for new committer and PMC members be consensus votes so a single person
can block the adding of a candidate.
Do any projects use some form of majority voting for new committers? What
are the reasons for allowing vetoes?
Than
16 matches
Mail list logo
