On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> CloudStack and OpenStack seem to be complementary and they use the same
> license. I expect collaboration between these projects to increase not
> decrease.
Why, if there is a different community that wants to do things in a different
way wh
On Apr 4, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> And we could simply ignore all this, as there was never any actual intent
> to assume an analogous situation. It was a flip comment. That's all. Please
> stop reading more into things, and escalating discussions.
One might test if the analogy hold
And we could simply ignore all this, as there was never any actual intent
to assume an analogous situation. It was a flip comment. That's all. Please
stop reading more into things, and escalating discussions.
Have fun. Move along.
-g
On Apr 4, 2012 11:47 AM, "Mohammad Nour El-Din"
wrote:
> Hi..
Hi...
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> >
> > On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> >
> >> On 03.04.2012 20:10, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>
> >>> Oh come on... 1st of all, it's a joke.
> >>
> >> One I do not
On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
>
>> On 03.04.2012 20:10, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> Oh come on... 1st of all, it's a joke.
>>
>> One I do not find funny at all.
>
> You should have. It was funny. Maybe you need a
> fu
oly power where
> feature differentiation is in the open-source code base.)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 13:32
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Simon Phipps
> Subject: Re: CloudStack I
, April 03, 2012 13:32
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Simon Phipps
Subject: Re: CloudStack Incubation proposal
On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> On 03.04.2012 20:10, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Oh come on... 1st of all, it's a joke.
>
> One I do not
On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> On 03.04.2012 20:10, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Oh come on... 1st of all, it's a joke.
>
> One I do not find funny at all.
You should have. It was funny. Maybe you need a
funny bone transplant?
>
>> And 2ndly, people could complain that we
On 03.04.2012 20:10, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Oh come on... 1st of all, it's a joke.
One I do not find funny at all.
> And 2ndly, people could complain that we should
> refuse the donation and force them to
> put all their code/energies into OpenStack...
CloudStack and OpenStack seem to be compl
On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> On 03.04.2012 19:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Now let's see who complains and says we're fragmenting the
>> cloud community or whatever... Where's Simon? :)
>
> Please, as far as I know the community situation regarding CloudStack
> seems to b
It was a joke. Let it go...
On Apr 3, 2012 1:57 PM, "Andreas Kuckartz" wrote:
> On 03.04.2012 19:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Now let's see who complains and says we're fragmenting the
> > cloud community or whatever... Where's Simon? :)
>
> Please, as far as I know the community situation regard
On 03.04.2012 19:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Now let's see who complains and says we're fragmenting the
> cloud community or whatever... Where's Simon? :)
Please, as far as I know the community situation regarding CloudStack
seems to be very different from the one concerning LibreOffice and
OpenOff
All,
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CloudStackProposal
The info that this was on its way kinda leaked out before all was
ready, but in the grand-scheme of things, with so many moving parts
and players, I think it went well.
Needless to say, it also proves, once again, t
13 matches
Mail list logo
